Tell me if the following sentence makes sense.
“I believe that abortion and homosexuality are sins so I think we should elect a man responsible for keeping abortion legal, funding it personally and legislating ‘gay rights’ because God approves”
Franklin is a fraud, has been a fraud and will be a fraud as long as he does this crap.
Prove me wrong.
My take on that article is Graham is speaking against those who have a pattern of not voting.
That is different than those who have a history of voting, clearly kept up with the candidates and issues, and then decided in 2012 that they could not ethically support any of the candidates.
I, too, question those who simply ignore their responsibility to become informed and vote. But, if they studied it and then decided to vote for Virgil Goode, then they still fulfilled that obligation and did what thought was ethically the best thing to do.
That’s why I would support a write-in or a third party in Mississippi versus Thad Cochran. I’m not Mississippian, but I would definitely counsel against a vote for Cochran. At the same time, I cannot vote for any pro-abortion candidate or anti-2nd amendment candidate or any anti-God candidate, so I’d never give my vote to a democrat in our current climate.
That’s why I will counsel write-in or 3rd party. The time for filing as an independent candidate in Mississippi has passed, but I really see nothing yet that says that controls who citizens can or cannot write in.