***God of the gaps fallacy.***
Standard response, Fuzz. You’ve made my point. Naturalists (read: evolutionists) who believe only in nature have to ignore the laws of nature to believe what they believe.
If your keys are in the kitchen and you refuse to look there you’re never going to find them.
In other words...... Nothing in the gaps fallacy.
Astronomy was what did me in, as far as accepting modern evolutionary dogma at face value as being virtually factual, I wasn’t even particularly Christian at the time. Edwin Hubble. He admitted avoiding certain avenues of inquiry and stonewalling certain conclusions, because it would lead to the “horror” of validating certain religious precepts. That’s the case across practically every scientific endeavor now. Rather than “god of the gaps,” it’s now “If it could lead to God, then there’s a gap.”
“Naturalists (read: evolutionists) who believe only in nature have to ignore the laws of nature to believe what they believe.”
It’s what is testable and provable, not what one believes.