I’ve worked with several federal agencies. These people are full of crap. When they found that her disk had “crashed” they had near time copies on media. They could have restored the data easily. Or, if there was a problem they could have simply copied the tape and set it aside.
What is interesting is that several people connected to Lerner had their hard drives “crash”. If that happened about the same time then given simple math no conclusion can be other than someone intentionally tampered with evidence.
An administration with regard to the rule of law would call for a special prosecutor. The punk won’t do that though.
“What is interesting is that several people connected to Lerner had their hard drives crash. If that happened about the same time then given simple math no conclusion can be other than someone intentionally tampered with evidence.”
I want to know why the IRS didn’t treat that as a security issue and possible hack? How did the players know it wasn’t a hostile act from an outside source?
Exactly right. When asked specifically why data was not recovered from the incremental (tape) backup, Koskinen opined that was not done probably because it was too much work.
Ive worked with several federal agencies. These people are full of crap. When they found that her disk had crashed they had near time copies on media. They could have restored the data easily. Or, if there was a problem they could have simply copied the tape and set it aside.
What is interesting is that several people connected to Lerner had their hard drives crash. If that happened about the same time then given simple math no conclusion can be other than someone intentionally tampered with evidence.
An administration with regard to the rule of law would call for a special prosecutor. The punk wont do that though.
*************
They keep talking about “printed” copies. Where are the printed copies of Lerner? Maybe I missed the Memo? (thread)