Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: william clark

The key difference is that Nixon didn’t have the major news outlets covering for him.


No, the key difference is Nixon had an opposition party interested in substantively engaging him directly. All we get from the GOP is a tip toe through the tulips. They steadfastly refuse to engage Obama directly for the crimes of his admin.


39 posted on 06/19/2014 7:41:10 AM PDT by lodi90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: lodi90

True, but if the arbiters of popular opinion, the mainstream media, were going after Obama, then trust me, the GOP would scrounge up some courage. Conversely, if they hadn’t had the support of the same media, I doubt the Dems, even back then, would have been so bold in challenging him.


59 posted on 06/19/2014 8:17:06 AM PDT by william clark (Ecclesiastes 10:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson