Replies

“What’s wrong with having knowledge of how to build something like that?”

As the Declaration of Independence says, “But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism...”

Such is their design. The closer they can get to a government monopoly on the use of force, the easier it will be—for them.

And they mask it all with prattle about “public safety.”

You want public safety? Make sure every citizen is armed, locked, and loaded. Then, abolish most of the alphabet agencies, and disarm the rest.

Without the Second Amendment, the Constitution is just a scrap of paper.

I have a proposal for the clarification of the Second Amendment.

*************************

A large number of armed men willing to protect it being necessary to the survival of the Constitution, neither the executive, the legislative, or the judicial branch of the United States government, nor any branch of any government of any of the several states, nor of any territory or district, shall pass any law, issue any edict, or take any action of any kind that has, whether as an intended or an unintended consequence, any restriction on the manufacture, import, sale, transfer, possession, or bearing on one’s person of any firearm of any description, or the ammunition, components, spare parts, or any other appurtenances thereto. Congress shall pass legislation mandating criminal penalties for violations of these provisions, and those penalties shall include but shall not be limited to loss of citizenship.

The term “firearm” means any weapon now in existence, and any technology that may render any of these obsolete, and any technology that in turn renders these new weapons obsolete, and thus forward in perpetuity.