Wanting to get to the bottom of this does not constitute “hate.” If you’ve got a problem with the truth, then it’s you who has a problem, correct? The Archbishop Of Dublin has strongly advocated this governmental inquiry, which is now ongoing. What we have is Irish Catholics wanting to get to the bottom of this, the Irish church supporting it, irreligious people trying to make hay of it and misguided traditional Catholics outside of Ireland attempting to deflect the whole thing to make it go away because they perceive it to be an embarrassment to the church. I have friends in Ireland, they’re Catholic in and around Dublin. They want the light of day shone upon this and to make it right as best that can be managed. I agree with them. I don’t agree with trying to sweep it under the rug. That hasn’t turned out so well in the past, now has it?
If you really wanted to get to the bottom of it, you would do some research instead of playing the Inquisitor. Clearly, you have an agenda, and you don’t hesitate to use it. The facts may appear harsh to you out of context; but if you had any clue about the utter, dire poverty of Ireland and most of Europe at that time, you would understand how there were mass interments, and why the nuns spent what precious little money they had on clothing, food, furniture, soap and bedding for the children. Stop displaying your ignorance of who is writing this trash — the so-called “mass grave” was discovered in 1975, and suddenly it’s leftist, religion-hating, uber socialist “news” — and get off your soapbox.
Here is the meme being proffered by Roman Catholics: “The missing Tuam children in a septic tank story is false!”
Reply to them: “So, that means that the children have therefore been found iof that is indeed true?”
Roman Catholics: “Um, well...”
The answer is obviously no. Even if the septic tank story is totally false, where are 796 children at? Arguing AGAINST the wseptic tank at Tuam story does not magically make 796 children un-disappear and be found.
They are still quite missing, aren’t they?
If it were 10, 20 or 30 that would be one thing. But 796?
No baptismal records or No burial records from the RCC and no proof of any consecrated ground burial. 3 strikes.
Butm, you know how it is, the RCC asks that others prove that they weren’t baptized, and that there was no consercrated gorund burial.