To: SoConPubbie
Romney would have been a good president. Not my first choice. Not even close. But he would have been good.
To: cornfedcowboy
Lemmie guess. you drink your corn from a jar.
128 posted on
06/15/2014 7:20:30 PM PDT by
Norm Lenhart
(How's that 'lesser evil' workin' out for ya?)
To: cornfedcowboy
That sure flies in the face of his single term as governor, which he failed at.
He gave up running for reelection and left office with 34% approval after giving the state gay marriage, banning guns, and creating Obamacare.
131 posted on
06/15/2014 7:29:22 PM PDT by
ansel12
((Ted Cruz and Mike Lee-both of whom sit on the Senate Judiciary Comm as Ginsberg's importance fades)
To: cornfedcowboy
Romney would have been a good president. Not my first choice. Not even close. But he would have been good.
Good for whom?
Big Business?
The Chamber of Commerce and their Amnesty plans?
He certainly would not have been good for either conservatives or this country long term.
During his campaign he:
1. Supported Abortion
2. Supported the Gay Agenda
3. Supported portions of Obamacare and wanted to install his RomneyCare(Another form of Socialized Medicine) in all 50 states.
4. Did not have any policies that were supportive of limited Government.
After he lost, just recently, he came out in favor of Amnesty, A.K.A. Comprehensive Immigration Reform.
So just who do you think he would have been a Good president for?
156 posted on
06/15/2014 10:09:10 PM PDT by
SoConPubbie
(Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson