I never saw a thread posing your 40 year conspiracy straw man. You asserted that straw man and now you wan ME to back something up?
I'm sure you think you just made an intelligent argument...
Let's try again, YOU need to provide documentation from the 1960s, not conspiracy theories cooked up in the last few years, to prove your point.
I never saw a thread posing your 40 year conspiracy straw man. You asserted that straw man and now you wan ME to back something up?
Really, you've never seen the theories that the birth announcement was somehow planted in the newspaper for illicit reasons.
I'm sure you think you just made an intelligent argument...
And I'm sure you consider yourself a renowned constitutional scholar.
What’s your point?