Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Federal effort could outlaw old ivory
Winston-Salem Journal ^ | May 29, 2014 | Terry Kovel/King Feature Syndicate

Posted on 06/07/2014 8:44:33 AM PDT by Bratch

An heirloom bronze elephant with ivory tusks, great-grandmother's piano with ivory keys, a vintage ivory chess set or an antique silver teapot with a small ivory inset in the handle to keep it cool may be "endangered" by proposed laws that could be in place sometime in June. Buying, selling or importing ivory from recently killed African elephants already is illegal and has been for about 25 years.

But an executive order issued by President Barack Obama would extend the ban to include all antique ivory harvested from elephants that died before 1914. There would be a law forbidding sales, even gifts to museums, of any ivory, including antique pieces. This affects antiques dealers and collectors, knife makers and collectors, Inuit craftsmen, owners of mahjong and chess sets, and manufacturers of musical instruments, including guitars and violins — the list could go on. And those in favor of strong endangered species laws want to also insist that all confiscated antique carved ivory art be destroyed — not even given to a museum.

Already thousands of pounds of ivory art objects have been destroyed. This will cause huge losses to companies, collectors and museums. Express your opinion in this controversy.

There's still time to contact your U.S. senator, representative or the Fish & Wildlife Service to make your thoughts known. For links to more detailed information, go to www.kovels.com/latest-news/new-ivory-ban.html.

(Excerpt) Read more at journalnow.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: executiveorders; ivory; obama
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last
To: Dark Knight

I think this would be fairer (and in line with the tone of the Constitution) but shoot, if you can presume to shut down coal plants, buying up all the ivory to throw it away would be nothing.


41 posted on 06/07/2014 10:07:31 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: G Larry
Are you trying to be funny or are you really ignorant of Constitutional separation of powers?

I'm not a troll from the DUmpster Underground so I assumed my post didn't need a sarcasm tag.

42 posted on 06/07/2014 10:11:17 AM PDT by Gay State Conservative (Rat Party Policy:Lie,Deny,Refuse To Comply)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative

I.e. being funny.

Look we don’t all have to be as grim as a nightmare of a black cat in a coal chute at night!


43 posted on 06/07/2014 10:14:46 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck
Look we don’t all have to be as grim as a nightmare of a black cat in a coal chute at night!

That's true.But it sounded like a serious question so I gave a serious reply.But they *do* say that it takes more muscles to frown than it takes to laugh.

44 posted on 06/07/2014 10:21:59 AM PDT by Gay State Conservative (Rat Party Policy:Lie,Deny,Refuse To Comply)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: moose07

Not to mention all the artifacts owned by museums.

In the late 50s my grandmother purchased an ivory chess set in Hong Kong, each piece beautifully carved with the opposing pieces stained sienna. It’s a family treasure and the gubmint can’t have it.


45 posted on 06/07/2014 10:27:02 AM PDT by CityCenter (Resist Obamacare!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Alas Babylon!
Then you'll hear from OUR lawyers; Dewey, Cheatem and Howe!

First...I assume that you know that the line I was referring to was one of Groucho's.Second,the only law firm I recall from the Stooges was "Goldman,Goldstein,Goldberg and O'Brien".And the guy answering the phone,who had a Yiddish/Hebrew accent,said at the end of his greeting...in that Yiddish accent..."O'Brien speaking".Funny stuff!

46 posted on 06/07/2014 10:34:08 AM PDT by Gay State Conservative (Rat Party Policy:Lie,Deny,Refuse To Comply)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: moose07

You cannot sell them, trade them or donate them to museums. The next step is that people will be reluctant to display them for fear of being accused of participating in some sort of illegal or at least, socially forbidden activity.

I have ivory artifacts. I will hang on to them. I will bequeath them to those who understand such things and hopefully, at some point in the future this will all subside, the amount of such items will have been decreased sufficiently that he old items will again have value by virtue of rarity.

This is just more feel-good-ism in the name of stopping something a few individuals deem bad. I will not be surprised when this regulation is extended to ebony, rosewood, mahogany,etc. I believe this has already been an issue with inlays on musical instruments. Then it will be all animal skins or even bone. At some point, perhaps all crystals or mineral specimens will be prohibited.

Where does this end?


47 posted on 06/07/2014 10:34:29 AM PDT by reformedliberal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative

Sorry.

It’s Hungadunga, Hungadunga, Hungadunga and McCormick. /pedantism


48 posted on 06/07/2014 10:37:40 AM PDT by reformedliberal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Vanders9
If you really wanted to stop the ivory trade, the best bet might be to completely legitimise it. The market would then be absolutely flooded with cheap, high quality stuff from the western world that people were trying to get rid of, and thereby do the poachers completely out of business. Problem solved. Do you think that will happen? Not a chance.

If you REALLY want to stop the poachers, make ivory legal, people will set up elephant ranches where they will raise elephants for their ivory (tranquilize the elephant, take the ivory, and let him grow more).

As a bonus, the country can issue poacher hunting licenses. There are people in the world who would pay money for that.

49 posted on 06/07/2014 10:40:04 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 (You don't notice it's a police state until the police come for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: CityCenter

Exactly, H*ll hath no fury like a Museum curator.
It is totally unenforceable.....Wrap up, lock away, keep quiet.
It is Cultural historical destruction, nothing more.
Boating accidents will become even more common. :)


50 posted on 06/07/2014 10:40:37 AM PDT by moose07 (the truth will out ,one day. .............................................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

I have a sterling chocolate set from the mid-1800s with an ivory heat protector on the handle. It was used to protect fingers from the hot contents. Since it is post-late 1700s, it would be illegal, even though it is a legitimate antique.


51 posted on 06/07/2014 10:41:44 AM PDT by reformedliberal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Bratch
But an executive order issued by President Barack Obama would extend the ban to include all antique ivory harvested from elephants that died before 1914.

You know what?

It's long past time that we simply ignore this petulant asshole child.

Let him order, we shall ignore. And if we are arrested for an illegal order, we shall resist. And if we are prosecuted and imprisoned, we shall exact revenge.

Period. End of sentence. F*** you, Mr. Obama.

52 posted on 06/07/2014 10:41:57 AM PDT by Lazamataz (Early 2009 to 7/21/2013 - RIP my little girl Cathy. You were the best cat ever. You will be missed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reformedliberal

Your guess is as good as mine.
Just put things where the Grand kids can’t see them....Sad.


53 posted on 06/07/2014 10:43:09 AM PDT by moose07 (the truth will out ,one day. .............................................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

While I agree with you wholeheartedly, the fact remains that no auction house will accept such items, no online sites will allow them listed, no museums will accept new donations, people will be intimidated via peer pressure from displaying/wearing them and they will be effectively eliminated.

I have Papuan masks which incorporate human hair. I personally collected them 40 years ago. I had to declare and show them to Customs when I came back to the States. At some point, I expect them to be considered unsellable and unacceptable for donation, let alone allowable into the country.

I do display all my treasures, so far. But the world is so full of nannies, I am reconsidering my attitude.


54 posted on 06/07/2014 10:48:52 AM PDT by reformedliberal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: reformedliberal
It’s Hungadunga, Hungadunga, Hungadunga and McCormick.

Yup,you're right.But you left out a Hungadunga.And the most important one too! ;-)

55 posted on 06/07/2014 11:08:11 AM PDT by Gay State Conservative (Rat Party Policy:Lie,Deny,Refuse To Comply)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: moose07
How exactly are they going to enforce this attempt at erasing cultural history.? Door to Door inspections ?

They'll give piano tuners a bounty for everyone they turn in. That extra home insurance art rider will be another bounty when your insurance agent turns in the paperwork. Your neighbor could also collect a check when they turn you in for grandma's piano, grandpa's pipe, great-aunt's hair pins and desk set. The neighbor will get extra brownie points ratting you out for having too many cans of peas in the pantry and weapons in the back of the closet.

56 posted on 06/07/2014 11:12:55 AM PDT by bgill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Bratch

Stupid federal overreach. If you want elephants to flourish, make the harvesting of ivory legal and give the natives incentives for managing herds and punishing (killing) poachers.


57 posted on 06/07/2014 11:16:39 AM PDT by zeugma (I have never seen anyone cross the street to avoid a black man in a suit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bratch

Don’t worry. Enforcement will only apply to peasants.


58 posted on 06/07/2014 12:20:32 PM PDT by kiryandil (turning Americans into felons, one obnoxious drunk at a time (Zero Tolerance!!!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Don Corleone; Rusty0604
Don't forget the 'flash bang grenades' and the deliberate killing of the family pet. Obama and his brown shirts.

Flash-bang grenades: They're "For The Children"...

59 posted on 06/07/2014 12:24:39 PM PDT by kiryandil (turning Americans into felons, one obnoxious drunk at a time (Zero Tolerance!!!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: bgill
Well that answers that little conundrum.
Barry really is the Pied Piper of Hamlin....all the Rats come out of the wood work on his command.
60 posted on 06/07/2014 12:37:28 PM PDT by moose07 (the truth will out ,one day. .............................................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson