[bamahead]

If he wins in Kentucky (by no means a sure thing) and acknowledges the Tea Party and the Conservatives in his next term, it might help vindicate my POV.

The only way he'll 'acknowledge' anyone except his Dem buddies and the Special Interests he's beholden to is to thumb his nose in spite at them. He will do whatever it takes to marginalize Cruz in the senate - as he already has. Would not surprise me to see him marginalize Rand Paul either. Mitch is only loyal to himself and his 'allies' - aka: McCain, Cantor, Graham, not to mention Reid and Obama.

[Kenny Bunk]

Two whores will be running for Senate in Kentucky, as often happens in our version of democracy.

Were I voting in Kentucky, I would definitely choose the whore who is less poxed. If some Lochinvar comes out of the west upon the Libertarian ticket, you can be sure the more poxed of the two whores shall win. Because the Libertarian Lochinvar will run with not only her blessing, but with the generous financial support of her party.

The Libertarians often say, "What's the difference? We get the same result, e.g., with a Bush as with a Clinton."

Of course, in this the Libertarians are quite obtuse. There may indeed may not be that many differences ... just very important ones. Can't have all you want in this game.