Nice try...you are making a new argument that does not exist...why do you insist on protecting those making claim that things are a fact, settled when in fact they are but theory? Why is this okay to you?
What argument am I making that doesn’t exist? As far as I can see, no one is claiming it as fact. Look at the title of the post. Can you see the word ‘suggest’? The article itself is riddled with the words ‘hypotheses’, ‘theories’, ‘evidence’ etc. etc. The same goes for all the other articles I’ve read about it as well.
Why don’t you stop with the whining and hand waving about a non-issue and tell us what it is about the study and the evidence it has produced that upsets you.