[Axenolith]

Those are not arguments Ansell,, they are statements/observations, and they aren’t “aggressive”.

You have a bad habit of rewording the responses and reasoning of your opponents, and getting bitchy at them for what appears to be their mere being bearers of bad news.

Focus on why someone should take that avenue, rather than say work for a stronger 2A or try to keep the Islamization of America from going down.

If you can point out the path to victory, heck, a reasonable CHANCE thereof, I’ll be glad to devote time to it.

[ansel12]

Those are not arguments Ansell,, they are statements/observations, and they aren’t “aggressive”. You have a bad habit of rewording the responses and reasoning of your opponents, and getting bitchy at them for what appears to be their mere being bearers of bad news.

LOL, calling what are pro-gay marriage arguments, "observations" doesn't change anything.

Do you really think that works on the abortion argument for example? Aggressively fighting the pro-life movement here and then just telling everyone that you are merely expressing your observations? Your argument is for us to drop our opposition to gay marriage, to move on from what you keep calling a losing cause.

There isn't any mystery of what side you are on.