Got it. But, no third-party ever for Constitutional conservatives? Just don’t want to believe that, unless...confiscation of the GOP is possible yet.
That last part also was sort of a question.
Hillary actually "remembered" that she “was personally and intensely involved in the debate over swapping five Taliban commanders for Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl in 2011 and 2012." Even though she naturally had severe reservations about the potential deal, and was demanding stricter conditions for the release of the prisoners than what President Obama settled for last week.
I love the part where Hillary valiantly asserts she "had a framework deal drawn up that was much tougher on the Taliban than what ultimately got done two years later."
It's such a relief that Hillary remembers the Gitmo/Bergdahl details b/c she had a nasty fall and was subject to blackouts.
Hillary has had problems "remembering" details about Benghazi (sob). So its pretty amazing that hillary "remembers" excruciating details about her part in the Bergdahl/terrorist swap.
=================================================
Hold on a sec, people. This means Hillary must keep a diary....the same diary Wash/Post's Bob Woodward has been looking for.
====================================================
BACKSTORY---News hound Bob Woodward Definitely Doesn’t Buy Hillary’s Benghazi Denial. Woodward doesn’t believe Hillary's whine that it's all about politics. The reporter known for making news claims there are still “serious, unanswered questions about this.”
Hillary's book stoutly declares that everything there is to know about Benghazi has already been revealed....she is hoping to silence Republicans by charging politics is behind the continuing probe.
Woodward will not be dissuaded. ".....one of the questions I have -- did she keep a diary? Obama confirmed to Woodward that he keeps a diary. Woodward noted. “Ronald Reagan kept a very detailed diary of Iran Contra, and he finally turned it over.”
The veteran Post reporter also knocked Clinton and Obama....... noting Benghazi is not about partisan politics, as they stoutly aver.
“There are facts,” Woodward asserted. “There is neutral inquiry. And there is a way to look at this and get that information and see if there is new information.”
With a 3rd party when the country is almost evenly divided, 2 of the 3 have to have an agreement that one doesn’t intend to win, like Perot did in the 1992 election.
Perot had no intention of winning his objective was to keep Bush from winning.
Run 3rd party on the right it divides the right. Both actually want to win and will do everything they can to win.
Left wing freaks, if they move to the right at all, would go for the more moderate of the 2 on the right.
You would end up with a McCain or Romney type at best and doubtful even that.
Hillary can buy the black vote by supporting reparations for slavery, which she already did in 2002.