exactly. it’s about JUSTICE.
Yes. It is about his being called to account for his actions, which ended up putting the men he served with directly at risk, getting men killed who were trying to find him, but primarily for leaving his post.
I have heard that he left a note saying he was deserting, but I haven’t seen a direct source yet on that, but his actions even in spite of his characterizing them or not, was desertion.
It makes me angry to see people trying to defend Bergdahl by painting the people who are angry about this as angry, illogical, partisan, islamophobic, racist nuts.
And I feel that I am fully justified in feeling anger at this. It is a typical leftist tactic, and it is an attempt to deflect important questions about Bergdahl’s behavior and the actions of the government.