Replies

I have empathy for for your positions and feelings regarding the Constitution and the current news surrounding the EPA. Yet, the ability of the EPA to regulate CO2 as a pollutant was ruled as being constitutional by the SCOTUS back in 2007.

But the Constitution does not give Obama these sweeping powers that cross over into legislative powers. Congress did not pass his proposed efforts to do this earlier. No he’s doing what he promised (just like Hitler used to do).
His acts are illegitimate and unconstitutional and he should be impeach for this and so many other reckless illegalities committed with clear evidence of premeditated malice.

Yet, the ability of the EPA to regulate CO2 as a pollutant was ruled as being constitutional by the SCOTUS back in 2007.

You mean the fragile whims of Anthony Kennedy found it constitutional, which then became a majority when combined with the votes of the four out and out Marxists on the court to create one of the worst rulings of the last 30 years. Besides, this is an evasion: neither the Clean Air Act nor the 2007 SCOTUS decision granted the EPA the authority to usurp Congress' legislative authority. That's a new twist adopted in the age of 0bama. If the separation of powers is a dead letter, so is the Constitution. If the Constitution is dead, then what we have is a tyranny.