Congratulations. In a thread full of inane statements, yours is the most inane so far. The number of shots is irrelevant. If you are threatened to the point where deadly force is necessary, then you shoot until the threat is stopped. Period. If that takes one shot or ten, it makes no legal difference. One shot can be too many if the shot is into a sleeping man, and ten can be perfectly fine if the meth-head is still moving towards you after the first nine.
If you are going to adjudicate this shooting based on how the number of shots makes you “feel,” please recuse yourself from ever serving on a jury, as you are not qualified...
If you think a prosecutor isn’t going to use the number of times the dopers were shot and why both of them needed to be shot, your naive...
I said that fact will make the case problematic for the defense...
You really think if GZ shoot Trayvon Martin five times he would be a free man?
I certainly don’t ....