Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/24/2014 5:12:21 AM PDT by TigerClaws
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last
To: TigerClaws
Gridlock is good.

One-party rule is tyranny.

25 posted on 05/24/2014 5:46:21 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum ("The more numerous the laws, the more corrupt the government." --Tacitus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerClaws

I don’t think our form of government has changed under Obama...so if he had a problem with it, why whine, why not just stay home and not bother being president? Or join some lawless outfit, like the Monochrome Coalition, where you can run around extorting businesses with impunity.


29 posted on 05/24/2014 6:07:44 AM PDT by BobL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerClaws

I’m tired of hearing how this “Constitutional scholar” doesn’t want to follow what it says.


30 posted on 05/24/2014 6:10:46 AM PDT by Cloverfarm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerClaws

Barry, that’s the one you have a majority in right now. You did know that, didn’t you?


31 posted on 05/24/2014 6:10:53 AM PDT by RichInOC (Barack Obama: I Love Me Some Me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerClaws

Obama only uses what intelligence he has to further his wealth and control of people. The four legged animals who hang by their tails and chatter have more common sense this man monkey ever thought of having. Go back to Kenya and live with your communist/Islam/devil worshippers friends.


32 posted on 05/24/2014 6:36:33 AM PDT by YukonGreen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerClaws
“At a Democratic fundraiser in Chicago Thursday night, Mr. Obama told a small group of wealthy supporters that there are several hurdles to keeping Democrats” - from instituting one party rule under his leadership, the principle problem being the US Constitution as construed by a bunch of dead white racist slave owners.
33 posted on 05/24/2014 6:38:13 AM PDT by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now it is your turn ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerClaws

Obama nailed it. But not in the way he wanted. His rant against the Founding Fathers and the Constitution demonstrates the wisdom of the structure of the Congress.

The whole purpose of having equal representation of all the states in the Senate is to keep a demagogue who controls the more populous states from passing laws that might be disadvantageous to the smaller states.


34 posted on 05/24/2014 6:54:32 AM PDT by wildbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerClaws

I think our founding Fathers realized people like Obama might be voted into the office, and they prepared for this problem. Hoooooray !!!


35 posted on 05/24/2014 7:00:02 AM PDT by chatham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerClaws
The man's supposed to be some great "constitutional scholar". That means he knew what the deal was going in. It was his job to deliver what he promised working within that framework and he failed miserably.

Now the whiney little pissant (apologies to actual pissants) is looking for a way to make that somebody else's fault.

37 posted on 05/24/2014 7:06:43 AM PDT by tacticalogic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerClaws
But, but....


39 posted on 05/24/2014 7:11:26 AM PDT by Delta 21 (Its my freedom. YES. I will be keeping it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson