Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: lee martell
Could the patrons file suit for damages because the restaurant, by not allowing them to bring personal protection, failed to adequately protect the patrons from danger?
11 posted on 05/24/2014 5:49:35 AM PDT by Traveler59 ( Truth is a journey, not a destination.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: Traveler59

Simple solution to the problem of carrying a gun into a place that does NOT allow guns, go somewhere else and spend your money. My gun is part of me and if you don’t allow my gun, you don’t allow me. End of story!


12 posted on 05/24/2014 5:57:33 AM PDT by DaveA37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: Traveler59

Most people are not going get that deeply involved in such a lawsuit or public complaint. Jack in the Box can always say their primary purpose is to provide fast food, not safe refuge from criminals outside of their actual restaurant. The employees would have a better chance of being taken seriously
using that argument, because they are confined to the premises for a set amount of hours. Heaven help the restaurants if their workers start heavy unionizing, because then, the employers would be subject to all manner of demands, on top of OSHA safety laws.


17 posted on 05/24/2014 9:03:41 AM PDT by lee martell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson