I said no such things. The tactic to get me to defend something I clearly did not say is not going to work.
I’ve made a clear argument on why government should have no role in what is supposed to be a union of two people before God. Under what circumstances do you believe government enforcement of this union before God complete with subsidizes and tax breaks and special rules is beneficial to marriage? Or do you put a marriage at the justice of the peace on equal footing as that of one before the church?
You are as unclear as can be, it is almost impossible to even figure out what your thinking is it is so silly.
Something about some internal fantasy of yours, but I'm not even sure what the fantasy is.
You can have any private religious "marriage" you want, as long as you don't care about it being recognized by the government and don't openly flaunt the laws against polygamy, for instance, so what is your complaint?