[LonelyCon]

Then the corrupt judge refused to allow the National Organization for Marriage to defend the law.

The judge's hands were tied on this issue by what the Supreme Court did last summer. Roberts (along with Scalia, Ginsburg, Breyer, and Kagan) decided that third parties cannot step in to defend a voter-passed law when a governor or state attorney general refuse to do so.

[dragnet2]

So the judge didn’t refuse...His private fed club already took care of that.

Ya notice the government, courts and the feds always have an excuse?

No one is at fault, his hands were tide, it couldn’t be helped, there is no way to combat this, the decision was made...and on and on and on...

[dragnet2]

third parties cannot step in to defend a voter-passed law when a governor or state attorney general refuse to do so.

Why? It begs the question, why was a voter passed decision not the final word?

What happened to rule of the people, majority wins, majority rules, free elections, the will of the people?

[dragnet2]

Does the Constitution of the United States begin with “We the Federal Judges and Government?”

Or does the Constitution of the United States begin with, “We the People?”

The will of the people is being gagged, choked and strangled by those in government.

[Jim from C-Town]

Bull Crap! He could have certainly read the Constitution and found the 10th amendment. It is right there in black and white and is every bit as valid as the 14th amendment and is even easier to understand.

What it is outright lawlessness.

We are no longer a country of laws and it is only going to get worse in the future.