Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DManA
That clause is in there. It's generally a "you're hurting business" clause.

In this case, it is the NBA who is escalating the remarks to a point where it arguably hurts business. Sterling's private remarks don;t have much effect at all, without amplification and reaction. Why should Sterling pay if the damage is caused by an unreasonable reaction on the part of an over-reacting (thin skinned, perpetually offended) NBA Commissioner? Player's Union? He pays his bills, the team shows up for games, etc.

I'm glad to see Sterling fighting - although he'd be crazy not to. If I was him, I'd be out to ruin Mr. Silver.

52 posted on 05/16/2014 8:31:29 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]


To: Cboldt

What’s an 80 year old billionaire got to lose?


54 posted on 05/16/2014 8:50:57 AM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

To: Cboldt
That clause is in there. It's generally a "you're hurting business" clause.

If his private conversation had remained private, it wouldn't have hurt business at all. The MSM is "hurting" the business by turning it into something of Holocaust proportions.

104 posted on 05/16/2014 11:29:55 AM PDT by Cementjungle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson