But that is the irony of the whole situation. They want to “protect” the environment as long as it doesn’t apply to them. If they were serious about applying their ideas equally they would get their reality check pretty quick. Most tree huggers think that they are morally superior to the rest of us, therefore the rules do not apply to them. They should be able to see Yosemite, and other areas of this state, but not the rest of us.
My liberal brother has lectured me more than once about how I should act and be, only to prove himself to be a huge hypocrite.
“But that is the irony of the whole situation. They want to protect the environment as long as it doesnt apply to them. If they were serious about applying their ideas equally they would get their reality check pretty quick. Most tree huggers think that they are morally superior to the rest of us, therefore the rules do not apply to them. They should be able to see Yosemite, and other areas of this state, but not the rest of us.”
Yeah, it’s the old “everyone wants to fly, but nobody wants to live next to the airport.”
P.J. O’Rourke said it best recently:
“At the core of liberalism is the spoiled child - miserable, as all spoiled children are, unsatisfied, demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic and useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats.”
Does that fit anyone you know?