Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: PapaNew; Darksheare; Jim Robinson; Lurking Libertarian

SCOTUS held in the Slaughterhouse cases that 14A protects the privileges and immunities of citizens of the United States but does not protect the same for citizens of a State.

That means that where there is a privilege or immunity guaranteed by the Constitution, the States cannot violate that privilege or immunity. (States can guarantee greater privileges and immunities but not lesser.) That is, in and of itself, incorporation against the states.

There was no constitutional right violated in the Slaughterhouse cases. So 14A was not violated.


50 posted on 05/10/2014 2:54:21 PM PDT by BuckeyeTexan (There are those that break and bend. I'm the other kind. ~Steve Earle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: BuckeyeTexan; Darksheare; Jim Robinson; Lurking Libertarian
Relevant to this discussion is the fact that Justice Miller wrote the the Supreme Court majority decision holding that Louisiana’s granting of a semi-monopoly in the slaughterhouse industry to one company was not a violation of the Fourteenth Amendment becasue the Fourteenth Amendment was established ONLY for the purpose of invalidating state laws that segregated blacks.
51 posted on 05/10/2014 3:06:52 PM PDT by PapaNew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson