Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/10/2014 10:21:14 AM PDT by Jim Robinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Utah Binger; Pete-R-Bilt; Godzilla; glock rocks

ping


2 posted on 05/10/2014 10:22:55 AM PDT by Jim Robinson (Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson

I sense we will be seeing some level of video feed from Utah rather short order.


3 posted on 05/10/2014 10:27:17 AM PDT by MeshugeMikey ( "Never, never, never give up". Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson

There’s enough trouble brewing without stirring up more of it.


4 posted on 05/10/2014 10:31:04 AM PDT by ctdonath2 ("If they bring a knife to the fight, we bring a gun" - Obama, setting RoE with his opposition)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson
The canyon was closed to motor vehicles in 2007, the agency said, after two men forged an illegal seven-mile trail. Hikers and those on horseback are still allowed there.

So in other words the land is not closed off. It's just closed to people who want to rip up the place with their ATVs. It's full of archeological sites and is sacred to the Navaho.

So here's a compromise. The BLM allows the ATV riders to have open season on the canyon and ride all over the places where the Navaho hold their ceremonies and gather their herbs and have their archeological sites. And the BLM also allow the Navaho to have a no limit open season on the ATV riders. See who's standing at the end.

6 posted on 05/10/2014 10:43:10 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

http://www.nationalreview.com/feed/377258/next-bundy-blm-backs-down-over-recapture-canyon-utah-protest-greg-pollowitz#!

The Next Bundy? BLM Backs Down Over Recapture Canyon, Utah Protest

snip

The BLM — after a huddle with the FBI, the Utah attorney general’s office, the
Utah Department of Public Safety and San Juan County Sheriff Rick Eldredge —
has decided once again to “stand back” and avoid a confrontation as it
did several weeks ago on the Bundy ranch in Nevada, Eldredge said.

“It was decided that, at the end of the day, it is not worth it to spill any
blood,” Eldredge said of the decision. . .
end snip


9 posted on 05/10/2014 11:09:15 AM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson

Bottom line: the Feds have way too much land.


11 posted on 05/10/2014 11:31:37 AM PDT by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson

Never did Veterans fight for the feds to keep control of lands that should belong to those the Vets fought for. It was no problem to give lands to former slaves from Southern farms, Lincoln said the lands out West should not belong to any government, managed by the South in particular.

What is it that this government has no respect of declarations and history?

Obviously there is a cabal of fiction people who think they are the heirs to the Founding Fathers’ National Treasure and the world.


13 posted on 05/10/2014 11:53:14 AM PDT by lavaroise (A well regulated gun being necessary to the state, the rights of the militia shall not be infringed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson

But, But,, the treaty of...

What a crock.

The federal government has no authority to HOLD ANY land other than what is listed, art 1, sec 8, 17th enumerated power.


16 posted on 05/10/2014 12:26:59 PM PDT by crz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson
Shouldn't "federally managed" read federally MISmanaged?
19 posted on 05/10/2014 1:52:04 PM PDT by hal ogen (First Amendment or Reeducation Camp?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson

I’m looking for the politician who will call for BLM to be disbanded and the lands they administer to be handed over to the states.

Aside from military bases and office buildings, the federal government should not own vast swaths of land. The land grab was a power grab and needs to be reversed.

For me the better answer would be to sell the land to US citizens, perhaps by lottery, with leaseholders having first shot at the land they lease. But BLM itself needs to go.

Under no circumstance should BLM arm itself beyond whatever right-to-bear-arms any other citizen has.


21 posted on 05/10/2014 2:47:45 PM PDT by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson
Hikers and those on horseback are still allowed there.

Thanks, benevolent overlords!
42 posted on 05/23/2014 5:37:12 PM PDT by andyk (I have sworn...eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson
I always wonder why every little piece of historical crap is so important. The geologists and paleontologists rarely learn anything new. So it's old - so what? Let Americans enjoy their back-country.

So some stupid lizard, toad, owl goes extinct because humans are in their habitat. Do the biologists ever admit that many just move away and still exist? No. More species have gone extinct than exist today, and not because of human activity.

Really, a sardine sized fish (forgot name) is reducing the water supply to California's fertile food-producing central valley and causing farms to shut down. I hate, yes said hate, the EPA. I get to say hate because it is a natural (which you love) and legitimate human emotion. Deal with it all you environmental nazis.

49 posted on 06/03/2014 3:57:07 AM PDT by A Navy Vet (An Oath is Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson