Posted on 05/05/2014 3:52:40 AM PDT by Fennie
TEHRAN (FNA) - Saudi Arabia has sent a large number of Takfiri fighters in Syria to Ukraine to fight the pro-Russian protesters in the European country.
"A large number of terrorist Takfiri fighters in Syria, who bear Saudi and Chechnian nationalities and receive financial and military backup from the Saudi intelligence agency, have been transferred to the Ukrainian capital, Kiev, on several planes to help the Ukrainian army in its fight against the pro-Russian population," an Arab security official told FNA on Sunday on the condition of anonymity due to the secrecy of the issue.
"The forces have been immediately dispatched to Kramatosk city in Eastern Ukraine, and are now fighting beside the Ukrainian army forces against the pro-Russians under the name of militias who support the government," the source added.
The source explained that Saudi Arabia seeks to take revenge from Russia and pro-Russian people in Ukraine due to Moscow's support for Syrian President Bashar al-Assad in the war on rebel groups.
(Excerpt) Read more at english.farsnews.com ...
One of my predictions to all this mess, is a jihad revival that storms over Moscow from the south
The Russian bear invading Israel while aligned with Persia, Libya and Sudan fits much nicer with an Islamic Russia
I wonder...
Russian chatter has been anti-Saudi and pro-Iranian for a long time.
All one had to ask; is islam involved? and there’s your answer. Then the warning bells rang when the Tartars threatened to bring their fighters ‘home’ from Syria. And the MSM never told you anything about that, did they?
Crimean Tatars Want UN Peacekeepers
April 01, 2014 1:28 PM
http://www.voanews.com/content/crimean-tatars-want-un-peacekeepers/1883983.html
excerpt:
After the meeting, Dzhemilev told VOA’s Russian service he feared Crimean Tatars could be the targets of violence under Russian rule, and he would like to see international peacekeepers deployed to Crimea.
“We have serious fears about what can happen there, and asked for the introduction of U.N. peacekeeping forces,” he said. “But since that is something decided by the U.N. Security Council, where Russia has the right to veto, this is quite unlikely.”
A second option, Dzhemilev said, would be to send in NATO forces, as was done in Kosovo.
Seems they want what NATO did in Serbia, what NATO did in Libya, what NATO wanted to do in Syria and couldn’t get away with...and the west is so busy blaming Russia they haven’t noticed islam is trying to start another civil war.
I don’t doubt Russia has plenty of guilt in this case but I’ve never bought the fantasy of utter Ukrainian innocence. I’m 50 years old and know that situations like this simply don’t have many innocent people aside from the civilians caught in the middle.
In this case you have Russia, The Ukrainians, The EU, and likely the USA all attempting to manipulate the situation and I want no part of it.
It is kind of interesting that just a couple of weeks ago Obama falsely declared that Kosovo gained their independence through a free and fair referendum. He didn’t mention the part about the forced removal of the Serbs from Kosovo first.
WHO ARE THE CRIMEAN TARTARS?
....Some of the children of the deported—raised in Uzbekistan and now adults—have returned to become leaders. Refat Chubarov, head of the Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People, the representative body of the Tatars, has called on his people—there are now approximately 300,000 Tatars in Crimea—to peacefully boycott the referendum. Nevertheless, some Crimean Tatars have vowed to oppose secession, with force if necessary.
According to Western press reports, some Tatars fighting with the rebels in Syria have offered to return to join the cause...
NATO is what? A tool of islam?
Kosovo independence: Russia warns of separatist storm
Christian Science Monitor ^ | February 20, 2008 | Fred Weir
Posted on 04 May 2014 02:51:18 PM by Mount Athos
Russian President Vladimir Putin charges that Western support for the newly declared state, torn from Serbia this week, is “immoral and illegal” behavior that will provoke a global storm of separatism and explode the international order.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3151903/posts
...Kosovo was seized by NATO in a 1999 war after Serbia was accused of the ethnic cleansing of the tiny territory’s mainly Albanian population. Russia opposed the war, but was persuaded to help negotiate a truce following 78 days of NATO air bombardment of Serbia. Russian experts claim that Moscow’s envoy, Viktor Chernomyrdin, convinced Serbian leader Slobodan Milosevic to surrender by conveying Western pledges that a NATO occupation of Kosovo would never lead to its separation from Serbia. Now, many Russians feel that Moscow’s influence was abused...
a little history:
2 million, that’s how many people the Crimean Tartars sold into slavery in the slave markets of Istanbul. This does not account for the rapes of women who were not taken into slavery, this does not account for the children and old, who died on Eastern Europe’s version of the Trail of Tears. This does not account for the millions who died defending their homes.
2 million is simply the number of people that were sold by the Crimean Tartars into slavery, in what they called ‘the Harvest.’ We can thank the Ottoman Turks for keeping good accounting of the taxes they collected on the sales.
The Crimean Tartars, you be the judge of what Poles, Moldavians, Belorussians, Russians, Ukrainians, Georgians, and Lithuanians think of them. And just as the Crimean Tartars remember 1944, everyone else remembers what came before.
Mujahideen, like clockwork! It is 1980s all over again! Kill the commies by any means necessary!
“We have serious fears about what can happen there, and asked for the introduction of U.N. peacekeeping forces,” he said. “But since that is something decided by the U.N. Security Council, where Russia has the right to veto, this is quite unlikely.”
A second option, Dzhemilev said, would be to send in NATO forces, as was done in Kosovo.”
And... ? I really wonder what in your opinion is so strange or bad in what that guy said.
SEE #46 ...According to Western press reports, some Tatars fighting with the rebels in Syria have offered to return to join the cause...
You never know your luck, you might still get your wish, NATO just might join the Tartar 'freedom fighters' returning from Syria and then you can have your lovely civil war, and watch as another country is bombed to rubble by NATO for islam.
It sure wouldn’t take much for this to turn into a huge world war. Maybe this is what Celente is counting on.
To those with much more smarts than me, which is probably all of you, what would happen to the world economy if something really big happened with this war?
I always look to see the publisher of any article as years ago I learned to do so due so many cloaked Leftist, or other interests trying to pull the wool over the eyes of the unsuspecting with their propaganda pieces.
The first thing I saw was the source as FARS, and I knew this was BS as it’s a leading Iranian propaganda disseminator.
I hope the Russians destroy them, the only good muslim is a dead one1
every one on the planet needs to be exterminated!
On that one we agree.
NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC NEWS - MARCH 14, 2014
According to Western press reports, some Tatars fighting with the rebels in Syria have offered to return to join the cause...
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3152234/posts?page=57#57
You might want to look a little deeper.
You wouldn’t know unless you searched each, and every little detail would you?.
Seems the Crimean Tatars are Sunni Muslims, and due their history with Stalin they are quite anti Russia. NO mention of them being Sunni Muslim’s in the link you provided, so had to research to find that tidbit.
Apparently, (my conjecture) the Takfiri must be shiite as Takfiri is defined as one muslim accusing another muslim of NOT being muslim enough such as is the case seemingly between the two sects.
With regards to the FARS story I do read it as a hit piece against the Saudi’s by Iranian propagandists though.
Re my post #59 should have read Wahabist instead of Shiite.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.