[HMS Surprise]

This long from over. There is no severibility clause in the ACA. Anything within the act that is held as being unconstitutional will kill the entire law. Hobby Lobby would kill it, origination would kill it too.

[Liz]

This is still far from over. There is no severibility clause in the ACA. Anything within the act that is held as being unconstitutional will kill the entire law. Hobby Lobby would kill it, origination would kill it, too.

Deserves a repeat---nice to have a "constitutional scholar" in the WH, isnt it?

[gitmo]

I thought SCOTUS already ruled the Obamacare Act doesn't say what it says, but rather says whatever it should have said to make it constitutional.

[servantboy777]

I'm not entirely convinced John Roberts abandoned conservatives. I believe it is entirely possible he knew Obozocare would be revisited once again if it was determined to be a tax.

History may end up being very kind to Roberts.

[Big Giant Head]

There is no severibility clause in the ACA. Anything within the act that is held as being unconstitutional will kill the entire law. Hobby Lobby would kill it, origination would kill it too.

So why is it still standing? Some provisions were ruled unconstitutional weren't they? The whole bill SHOULD be smoldering in ruins already, but it's being enforced illegally.

[Jeff Chandler]

There is no severibility clause in the ACA.

The Supreme Court could find that severability was implied.