So you area suggesting I do something you won’t do? Why? You are the one promoting the idea. I have no interest in it. Why not stop wasting time with your worthless suggestion? Either you do something with it, or leave me alone on the subject. I’m tired of hearing about it.
As for establishing that Abercrombie is a brazen liar, as I said before, no court intervention is necessary to prove the point. Abercrombie proved it himself. He’s not a good liar. He’s a clumsy, ridiculous liar. But he did show us one thing: he is willing to lie, however stupidly, on Obama’s behalf. The ‘on Obama’s behalf’ being the critical part. Since Abercrombie has a pattern of lying for Obama’s benefit, he has no credibility. You don’t need a judge to establish this fact. Abercrombie established it himself, in spades.
In a more general vein, where on earth did you get the idea that a politician saying something makes it true? Liberals believe that if a prog pol says something it’s true. Conservatives believe almost no politicians. There are a few, a precious few, whose word we respect. But they have proven themselves trustworthy. Principally, they have shown themselves willing to buck the establishment and weather the storm of abuse that ensues. These rare pols have earned the respect of conservatives. No others have.
So what are you trying to prove with your, ‘A politician said it so it must be true’ mantra? It’s naïve at best. Naïve because, hint hint, pols lie. They lie for a wide range of reasons, including but not limited to self-aggrandizement, expediency, votes, in order not to ‘rock the boat’, and to please those in power. Some, like Obama, lie pathologically. But however it may be, politicians lie. If you want to argue, ‘A politician said it so it must be true’, I suggest you find someone even more naïve than yourself. Perhaps then you will have a receptive audience.
I am not suggesting that you do anything. You, I and others are discussing an issue on a blog, nothing less, nothing more.
There have been more than 300 civil actions filed on this issue. I am suggesting a possible alternative approach for judicial or congressional action which has not been utilized yet as far as I can tell. In my humble opinion it would be best if an attorney were to seek a court order.
If my idea of seeking a court order or a congressional subpoena doesn’t make sense to you, then so be it; to each his own.