Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Brad from Tennessee

The ruling is bogus and without merit. Arkansas should just ignore it. Period.


20 posted on 05/02/2014 7:01:10 PM PDT by lakecumberlandvet (Appeasement never works.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: lakecumberlandvet

In 2008 the Supreme Court ruled that states can require voters to produce photo identification without violating their constitutional rights, validating Republican-inspired voter ID laws.

In a splintered 6-3 ruling, the court upheld Indiana’s strict photo ID requirement, which Democrats and civil rights groups said would deter poor, older and minority voters from casting ballots. Its backers said it was needed to prevent fraud.

The law “is amply justified by the valid interest in protecting ‘the integrity and reliability of the electoral process,’” Justice John Paul Stevens said in an opinion that was joined by Chief Justice John Roberts and Anthony Kennedy. Stevens was a dissenter in Bush v. Gore in 2000.

Justices Samuel Alito, Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas also agreed with the outcome, but wrote separately.

Justices Stephen Breyer, Ruth Bader Ginsburg and David Souter dissented, just as they did in 2000.


23 posted on 05/02/2014 7:10:09 PM PDT by stirrinthepuddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: lakecumberlandvet
The ruling is bogus and without merit. Arkansas should just ignore it. Period.

I agree. We are no longer a country of rules. Black robed dictators do not rule this country.

51 posted on 05/03/2014 10:03:08 AM PDT by stevio (God, guns, guts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson