Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

High carbon dioxide levels set a record
SFGate.com ^ | 5/1/14 | David Perlman

Posted on 05/01/2014 10:20:56 AM PDT by NormsRevenge

There's striking new evidence that Earth's atmosphere is increasingly saturated with carbon dioxide, the major gas from fossil fuel emissions that trigger climate change.

...

"This should be taken as a warning," said Ken Caldeira, an atmospheric scientist with the Carnegie Institution's department of global ecology at Stanford University. "It is time to stop building things with tailpipes and smokestacks.

"It is time to stop using the sky as a waste dump for our carbon dioxide pollution. If we fail to heed this warning, our children will end up living in a world that is much hotter than any human being has ever experienced."

The instruments that have been measuring carbon dioxide for more than 50 years showed that for the entire month of April, levels of the gas exceeded 400 parts per million for the first time, said Pieter Tans, a climate scientist at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Agency who monitors the instrument record.

The precise average for the entire month was 401.25 parts per million as of Tuesday, he said, and that level had only reached the crucial 400 threshold for the first time during a single day a year ago before dipping slightly.

(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: carbondioxide; climatechange; davidperlman; globalwarming; greenhousegases; kencaldeira; levels; noaa; pietertans; record
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-87 next last
To: Ruy Dias de Bivar

I wonder how much methane a planetful of dinosaurs could make? Did they cause their own extinction via global warming?


61 posted on 05/01/2014 12:00:01 PM PDT by Alex Murphy ("the defacto Leader of the FR Calvinist Prohttp://fraangelicoinstitute.files.wordprtestant Brigades")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Scripps must not be very good in that math stuff. Water vapor is about 95-97% of all greenhouse gases. CO2 cannot be THE major greenhouse gas.
62 posted on 05/01/2014 12:04:44 PM PDT by prof.h.mandingo (Buck v. Bell (1927) An idea whose time has come (for extreme liberalism))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Fedupwithit
Incredibly cool!!! You got both of them. This exceeds my wildest expectation :)
63 posted on 05/01/2014 1:06:14 PM PDT by upchuck (Support ABLE, the Anybody But Lindsey Effort. Yes, we are the ABLE!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
No smoking hot spot

1. The greenhouse signature is missing. We have been looking and measuring for years, and cannot find it.

Each possible cause of global warming has a different pattern of where in the planet the warming occurs first and the most. The signature of an increased greenhouse effect is a hot spot about 10km up in the atmosphere over the tropics. We have been measuring the atmosphere for decades using radiosondes: weather balloons with thermometers that radio back the temperature as the balloon ascends through the atmosphere. They show no hot spot. Whatsoever.

If there is no hot spot then an increased greenhouse effect is not the cause of global warming. So we know for sure that carbon emissions are not a significant cause of the global warming. If we had found the greenhouse signature then I would be an alarmist again.


64 posted on 05/01/2014 2:08:30 PM PDT by TigersEye (Stupid is a Progressive disease.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Heatseeker; Flick Lives
Stop it, you racist, capitalist, deniers!

/s (if necessary)

65 posted on 05/01/2014 2:12:50 PM PDT by ExGeeEye (The enemy's gate is down...and to the left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Never seen in history? Depends on what history means. If you're talking geologic history, levels have gotten as high as 7000 ppm.

RUN FOR YOUR LIVES!

Global Warming PING!

You have been pinged because of your interest in environmentalism, alarmist wackos, mainstream media doomsday hype, and other issues pertaining to global warming.

Freep-mail me to get on or off: Add me / Remove me

Please ping me to all note-worthy threads on global warming.

Global Warming on Free Republic

Latest from Global Warming News Site

Latest from Greenie Watch

Latest from Real Climate

Latest from Climate Depot

Latest from Junk Science

Latest from Terra Daily

Latest from CO2 Science

66 posted on 05/01/2014 7:07:21 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (The PASSING LANE is for PASSING, not DAWDLING)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Fedupwithit

I have copied your images mercilessly without atrribution. :-)


67 posted on 05/01/2014 7:11:03 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (The PASSING LANE is for PASSING, not DAWDLING)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: 11B40; A Balrog of Morgoth; A message; ACelt; Aeronaut; AFPhys; AlexW; alrea; America_Right; ...

PING to #66.


68 posted on 05/01/2014 7:14:00 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (The PASSING LANE is for PASSING, not DAWDLING)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Fedupwithit; upchuck
Personally, I like linking together a few of your bottom one, thus:


69 posted on 05/01/2014 7:22:04 PM PDT by FreedomPoster (Islam delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: molson209

>>Very Very good for the Plants

It is quite common for greenhouses to inject additional CO2 to maintain around 1000 ppm. If you search around, it is easy to find suppliers of such systems.

Clearly the CO2 Warmists hate poor people and want to starve them.


70 posted on 05/01/2014 7:26:27 PM PDT by FreedomPoster (Islam delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
levels of the gas exceeded 400 parts per million for the first time

...during that 50 year span, which does not include prior periods when it was ten or more times that high, and life thrived.

71 posted on 05/01/2014 8:22:33 PM PDT by ApplegateRanch (Love me, love my guns!©)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

I remember when they said this concentration would be a global disaster.

I remember protesters caring 400 signs.


72 posted on 05/01/2014 8:37:43 PM PDT by dila813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney
"saturated with carbon dioxide"

A person who writes words for a living ought to learn the meaning of the words they use, instead of trying to terrorize others with false claims like this.


Not just "saturated" but "INCREASINGLY saturated." That's a much higher order of ignoramce.
73 posted on 05/02/2014 2:24:36 AM PDT by clearcarbon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Carbon Dioxide is not the major greenhouse gas, water vapor is. The diagram is wrong.

Considering CO2 is a trailing indicator, it would stand to reason that it would continue to rise even after the temperature leveled off.

So, wait for it.

If there really is a problem, we can always panic later.

74 posted on 05/02/2014 2:41:06 AM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

To be as scientifically imprecise as the moonbats, since it takes carbon content to make ordinary iron into steel, maybe we need to mine more iron to sequester carbon in by making steel, and then build things with the steel...


75 posted on 05/02/2014 2:50:09 AM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: BikerJoe
Is this the reading they got from the top of Mauna Loa, a freakin' active volcano?

Same measurement has been made worldwide although a little lower and less annual wiggle in the southern hemisphere.

76 posted on 05/02/2014 2:56:16 AM PDT by palmer (There's someone in my lead but it's not me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: stubernx98
An Icelandic Volcano that erupted recently, produced more CO2 in four days than all the supposed reductions by man in CO2 for the last 40 years.

True. But while natural CO2 lags warming, manmade made CO2 is far higher than what we would get from warming after the Little Ice Age. With about a 1C naturak rise in temperature we should see 5-10 ppm rise in CO2. Instead there is a 120 ppm rise so far.

77 posted on 05/02/2014 3:01:29 AM PDT by palmer (There's someone in my lead but it's not me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Bernard Marx
In fact paleo-climate experts seem in agreement that elevated CO2 levels occur on average about 800 years *after* warming spikes

That is true. But the rise in CO2 is about 5-10 ppm per 1C rise in temperature. So we can say that 5-10ppm of the current is natural, the rest is almost certainly manmade. There's a tiny bit of wiggle room for outgassing we are not aware of and smooothing of ice cores, but not much.

78 posted on 05/02/2014 3:04:52 AM PDT by palmer (There's someone in my lead but it's not me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: The Great RJ
a single large volcano eruption would be enough to trigger an ice age

Possible in the cold direction. But volcanoes don't put out much CO2 compared to humans so not in the warm direction. Your greater point is valid though, there is a lot of thermal inertia and negative feedback that would prevent any such catastrophe.

79 posted on 05/02/2014 3:07:07 AM PDT by palmer (There's someone in my lead but it's not me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: wideawake

“Isn’t it convenient how all the important “thresholds” are in decimal?”

Yes, that’s how you know they are being pulled out of someones a$$.


80 posted on 05/02/2014 4:39:30 AM PDT by beef (Who Killed Kennewick Man?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-87 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson