Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Lizavetta

He’s being nailed for the commercial effects of having voiced his thoughts in such a way that he has harmed his fellow Owners. Do you not believe the owners have the right to form an association that gives them recourse for such damage?


59 posted on 04/30/2014 10:39:22 PM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]


To: 9YearLurker
He’s being nailed for the commercial effects of having voiced his thoughts

.... in a private illegally recorded conversation. Think of the implications of that to you, me, anyone.

63 posted on 04/30/2014 10:44:19 PM PDT by Lizavetta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]

To: 9YearLurker
He’s being nailed for the commercial effects of having voiced his thoughts in such a way that he has harmed his fellow Owners. Do you not believe the owners have the right to form an association that gives them recourse for such damage?

Only if it's explicitly spelled out in the agreement to which they and Sterling agreed. Absent such an agreement, he has a First Amendment right to be a screaming racist.

Absent such an agreement, it should be payday for the trial lawyers!

And, I, who am not a basketball fan, shall thereby gain a windfall of free entertainment. Popcorn time!

72 posted on 05/01/2014 12:26:48 AM PDT by cynwoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson