Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rbmillerjr
It’s about tougher economic sanctions, not war.

And how often has one led to the other?

184 posted on 05/01/2014 12:31:04 PM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]


To: DoodleDawg

Notice how they have avoided that issue over the whole argument?


187 posted on 05/01/2014 12:34:20 PM PDT by Norm Lenhart (How's that 'lesser evil' workin' out for ya?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies ]

To: DoodleDawg

...It’s about tougher economic sanctions, not war....

“And how often has one led to the other?”

Usually the war has already started, prior to the appeasing measure. Annexing sovereign land is an act of war. Russia sending in specops troops to prep for a land grab is an act of war.

History illustrates it well. Germany annexed Sudetenland and other areas. Was the appeasing action (meaningless treaties of promise not to annex more land) the cause of the war? No. The war had already started. Though appeasement causes more acts of war. Were the sanctions on the Imperial Japanse the cause of war? No they had already invaded many other sovereign nations.


188 posted on 05/01/2014 12:37:01 PM PDT by rbmillerjr (Russians to the Left of me, Useful Idiots to the Right...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson