What is the point of that irrelevant post?
The pro-life movement is winning, now is not the time to surrender and start undercutting it.
Why would Paul start undercutting the pro-life movement, is it because it is a fundamental rejection of libertarianism, and it is now winning, and that once people switch to pro-life, that they gain a new awareness of the depth and meaning of the Christian right, and conservatism and start doubting the image that social issues are meaningless to the soul and future of America?
We aren’t winning. There are some more restrictions; there are fewer abortions; these are positive signs but not clear enough to say the pro-life side is winning.
Roe v. Wade is nowhere near being overturned, and never will be unless a great majority of Americans stops having abortions and rejects the right to abortion in law. That is different from thinking abortion is a bad thing.