Skip to comments.
About Rand Paul’s Susan Collins Endorsement
Bangor Daily News ^
| April 27, 2014
Posted on 04/29/2014 1:25:30 PM PDT by SoConPubbie
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 next last
To: x
Paul did not have to get involved with Susan Collins, this is just more of his establishing what his politics are.
21
posted on
04/29/2014 3:15:06 PM PDT
by
ansel12
((Libertarianism offers the transitory concepts and dialogue to move from conservatism, to liberalism)
To: SoConPubbie
Mitt Romney, Mitch McConnell, Sue Collins,.....that’s just too many endorsements to ignore.
22
posted on
04/29/2014 3:17:28 PM PDT
by
grania
To: sickoflibs
Maybe Rand’s poll numbers are up because he is trying to restore our personal freedoms. He’s one of the few attempting to reign in the runaway police state of the NSA, TSA and NDAA.
Gay marriage and abortion are not the only two issues on the table.
23
posted on
04/29/2014 3:19:23 PM PDT
by
Georgia Girl 2
(The only purpose o f a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
To: x
It's Maine, folks. Unless trees get the vote up there, they will never elect any Republican who conservatives in the rest of the country would think of as conservative. Right now Collins doesn't have an opponent, and nobody who has a chance of winning the general election is on the horizon as a potential opponent.
A more proforma> endorsement might have sufficed. Something like, "I'm a Republican and I want to have a Republican Senate. So I'm for Senator Collins."
24
posted on
04/29/2014 3:39:07 PM PDT
by
TBP
(Obama lies, Granny dies.)
To: ansel12
Who are Massie and Amash?
Two House members with similar libertarian/conservative views who don't have Presidential delusions.
To: x
It's Maine, folks. Unless trees get the vote up there, they will never elect any Republican who conservatives in the rest of the country would think of as conservative. Right now Collins doesn't have an opponent, and nobody who has a chance of winning the general election is on the horizon as a potential opponent.
A more pro forma endorsement might have sufficed. Something like, "I'm a Republican and I want to have a Republican Senate. So I'm for Senator Collins."
26
posted on
04/29/2014 4:01:36 PM PDT
by
TBP
(Obama lies, Granny dies.)
To: SoConPubbie
This was the same Romney who deployed campaign lawyers to the Republican National Convention and rigged the future nomination process. What exactly is this writer talking about?
27
posted on
04/29/2014 4:04:31 PM PDT
by
dead
(I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
To: SoConPubbie
Is he a political player or an opportunist sellout? There's a difference?
28
posted on
04/29/2014 4:06:05 PM PDT
by
Hugin
To: TBP
A more proforma> endorsement might have sufficed. Something like, "I'm a Republican and I want to have a Republican Senate. So I'm for Senator Collins."
Certainly. If reporters asked Rand Paul in Washington, he might have said just that.
But he went to Maine for the state party convention. You don't take a trip like that to be half-hearted about the state's woman in Washington, who is in a sense your host.
It's a sign he's seriously running for president, and, like kissing babies, making nice with the party's elected officials -- not letting them down on their own turf -- is part of running for president.
I'm wondering if in party politics, "wholeheartedly endorsing" somebody isn't actually a "pro forma" -- that is half-hearted and insincere -- endorsement. It's is, after all, only words, and politicians are profligate in throwing words around.
29
posted on
04/29/2014 4:08:19 PM PDT
by
x
To: Forgotten Amendments
I can see why you are vague, they seem a little vague too on things like gay marriage.
30
posted on
04/29/2014 4:23:08 PM PDT
by
ansel12
((Libertarianism offers the transitory concepts and dialogue to move from conservatism, to liberalism)
To: tips up
It’s against an ACLU liberal democrat. She has no primary opponent. She’s going to win by 40% here in the fall.
31
posted on
04/29/2014 4:26:32 PM PDT
by
pithyinme
(Oh great 3 more years of crap to wade through....)
To: Georgia Girl 2
Gay marriage and abortion are not the only two issues on the table. Anyone soft on those, is no conservative.
32
posted on
04/29/2014 4:27:06 PM PDT
by
ansel12
((Libertarianism offers the transitory concepts and dialogue to move from conservatism, to liberalism)
To: mulligan
"Most politicians are corrupt, worthless and incompetent. Party affiliation makes little difference. Why do you think we are in our current mess?" That's because most of them are stinking lawyers... NEVER send a lawyer to Washington.... It's an absolute conflict of interest..!
They'll rob you for the fun of it...
I think it was P. T. Barnum that said "never let a fool keep his money"...anyway, that's how most all lawyers operate... Never trust them to act in your behalf...they will ALWAYS check their pockets first...
33
posted on
04/29/2014 4:43:05 PM PDT
by
unread
(Rescind the 17th. Amendment...bring the power BACK to the states...!)
To: MrEdd
That’s the problem. Principle vs practicality. Try to win control of the senate even with some RINOS or stand on principle and give Dingy Harry two more years at the helm.
34
posted on
04/29/2014 4:54:08 PM PDT
by
tips up
(Living is easy with eyes closed, misunderstanding all you see.)
To: SoConPubbie
RE :”
Silly boy, did you think my posts and others posts about Rand Paul were about forcing his poll numbers down” Of course!!! LOLO
35
posted on
04/29/2014 4:56:27 PM PDT
by
sickoflibs
(Obama : 'You can keep your doctor if you want. I never tell a lie ')
To: Georgia Girl 2
RE :”
Maybe Rands poll numbers are up because he is trying to restore our personal freedoms.” Well its getting the natives restless.
36
posted on
04/29/2014 4:57:32 PM PDT
by
sickoflibs
(Obama : 'You can keep your doctor if you want. I never tell a lie ')
To: tips up
Myopic reasoning which utterly fails to take in all the factors.
Your brand of capitulation (and that is all your reasoning is youfail to comprehend its not mere pragmatism) is how the Romney and McCain wing became dominant.
No more. Your brand of thinking had its chance and failed spectacularly.
It is time for the adults to stand up.
37
posted on
04/29/2014 5:49:22 PM PDT
by
MrEdd
(Heck? Geewhiz Cripes, thats the place where people who don't believe in Gosh think they aint going.)
To: SoConPubbie
Does Susan Collins have a primary opponent??
38
posted on
04/29/2014 6:35:17 PM PDT
by
JSDude1
(Defeat Hagan, elect a Constutional Conservative: Dr. Greg Brannon!)
To: sickoflibs
39
posted on
04/29/2014 6:46:50 PM PDT
by
Georgia Girl 2
(The only purpose o f a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
To: ansel12
I can see why you are vague, they seem a little vague too on things like gay marriage.
Oh. I should've read your tagline. And not taken you seriously. My apologies.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson