Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Repeal 16-17
The bigger issue is the idea of forcing Sterling to sell the Clippers. If the NBA can do that, are any of the owners truly "owners"?

Yes. They are owners of a franchise. If the other NBA owners vote to force him to sell, and he refuses to actually sell the team, they could just strip him of his franchise - he woud still own the facilities, etc., but he would no longer own an NBA franchise.

292 posted on 04/29/2014 1:45:15 PM PDT by Conscience of a Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 278 | View Replies ]


To: Conscience of a Conservative

Interesting. I have to educate myself about franchise business law, and how owning a franchise is different than just owning your own business outright.


302 posted on 04/29/2014 1:54:39 PM PDT by Dilbert San Diego (Im)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 292 | View Replies ]

To: Conscience of a Conservative
If the other NBA owners vote to force him to sell, and he refuses to actually sell the team, they could just strip him of his franchise - he woud still own the facilities, etc., but he would no longer own an NBA franchise.

Then the better term would be "franchisee" with the NBA being the franchisor. What is the limiting factor? Can the NBA Board of Governors (the "owners") always expel an owner for any reason not prohibited by law? If yes, then each owner will live in fear of his fellow owners. Dallas Mavericks Owner Mark Cuban realizes the dangerous precedent that has been set. How about the other owners/franchisees?

323 posted on 04/29/2014 2:18:23 PM PDT by Repeal 16-17 (Let me know when the Shooting starts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 292 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson