Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ben Ficklin

The problem isn’t the grazing fee, but the continuous reduction in the number allowed. They also are retiring huge sections of land from any grazing based on human=evil. This is contrary to public law, which still mandates multiple use.

Oh....and I am absolutely certain that my senators, John McCain and Jeff McFlake, would gladly raise grazing fees.


41 posted on 04/26/2014 7:01:24 AM PDT by Mr Rogers (I sooooo miss America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: Mr Rogers
You're right. Units grazed and acres for grazing has fallen. But other uses(multi use) has grown. For what and how much.

From 1976 to 2000 grazing units fell from 10.1 million to 9.8 million

What increased? Conservation Areas and Natl Monuments, Coal, historical and archeological sites, areas of critical concern, recreation areas, endangered and threatened species, wilderness and wilderness study areas.

This is from 1976 to 2000 so these trends likely continued after 2000.

Snapshot of Pre and Post FLPMA Management

60 posted on 04/26/2014 10:29:29 AM PDT by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson