Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: duckln
I've been asking this question for weeks: if what RT does is ok because MSNBC does it, is what MSNBC does ok because RT does it?

And take it another step farther. How come we don't see FReepers "excusing" MSNBC by citing RT, instead of "excusing" RT by citing MSNBC?

24 posted on 04/25/2014 11:05:35 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]


To: 1rudeboy
Comparing RT with MSNBC is comparing apples to oranges.It's like comparing the Wheel of Fortune Show with the Jerry Springer Show

Comparing RT with the NYT is closer to apples to apples.

From what I've read, the NYT's, has had a playbook agenda by it's neocon owners, to destroy Russia. They never give the other side of the argument. They are supporting an empire against a weak and now isolated country.

The RT is supporting it's country in a more nuanced and truthful way.

To read both, objectively , is hard for biased people, but so far the RT is winning.

33 posted on 04/25/2014 11:40:15 AM PDT by duckln
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson