For the life of me I cannot figure out why she is being talked up as a candidate for POTUS!
Elizabeth Warren is a classic example of how the Democrats use both women and the media. When she claims to be Native American, the media swoons over "a member of a disadvantaged minority achieving greatness" and the women over at your nearby Natural Nutrition store ooh and ahh. Then, when it leaks out that wellllllll, she might not EXACTLY be Native American, the media declares that there's a hatchet job (pun intended) being played on her, and the women over at your nearby Natural Nutrition store get up in arms because evil Republicans are trying to SILENCE this member of a disadvantaged minority! It's a quick jump from there to three of the women over at your nearby Natural Nutrition store starting a drive to get Warren to run for President because "She fights the Entrenched Male Power Structure!" ... After which, a member of the local media interviews the Warren for President people, the AP or some other wire picks up the story, it goes national, and suddenly we have "Elizabeth Warren for President" ... And she didn't have to do a single thing, except lie.
2) Engages/develops policies that are destructive and unrealistic to sustain a proper functioning civilization, but make people “feel good or better” for them
3) Believes in the right to selfishly murder ones developing offspring.
4) Is a Marxists economically as well as culturally (Political Correctness) and is obsessed with destroying Western Civilization ideals
5) Ivy League product, which many carelessly believe they are society's oracles deserving praise. Intelligence however does automatically go together with wisdom.
6) Has high cheekbones.
7) Is a member of the Democrat Party, thus gets glorification from the mainstream sycophantic press.
Warren has a lot of grass-roots support among the far-lefties. So it's not all MSM hype.
Here's my guess as to why. Those folks are really, really pining for a liberal woman president. But they see Hillary as having too many big business ties. So it's Warren instead.
She has little experience and isn't very bright making her an easily controllable stooge.
She is nearly unknown nationally making it easy to fabricate a backstory about her.
She's a she so she has a built in victim status.
Warren is the Dem's next manufactured sock puppet like 0bama. Another teleprompter-hologram-project yourself on the blank screen-plastic candidate.
The left has its purists, too. People who backed Dennis Kucinich, Mike Gravel, Paul Wellstone, Al Sharpton, Larry Agran, Jesse Jackson, Fred Harris, Shirley Chisholm. Howard Dean and Jerry Brown, too, maybe.
They don't like the Clintons who are seen as too corporate and Establishment and middle of the road, but they won't vote for Nader because they like Republicans even less.
Warren is probably better known and has gotten farther in the political process than the candidates these people usually vote for in primaries, so they talk her up now, even though she's not really very experienced and would make an awful president.
Gee, do you really want to re-hash all the ridiculous candidates the dems have put up for president that ended up beating the republican nominees?
Leftist...Pathological Liar....No sense of shame or decency...
How can she not be talked up as a Democrat candidate?