If one of these is to be the President that leads us out of the fascist wilderness, they must speak out on the Battle of Bunkerville. Rand Paul made some timid comments against tyranny.
From the best the Republicans have to offer, crickets. I predict all three will eventually come down on the side of tyranny. We have no friends in the Give Obama Power party.
I agree with you about their hesitancy to side with the ranchers in Nevada, but that will change over the coming weeks. To Paul’s credit, he has spoken out....he mentioned both SWAT tactics and the constitutional error of the Fed owning all those state lands, so I’m not sure what the beef with him on that is. My beef is about his seeming willingness to go along with some road to amnesty, and his unwillingness to recognize the value of overseas pre-staging of troops in a very dangerous age.
Cruz is uncharacteristically silent, but he has spoken against the SWAT Tactics. Palin has also spoken against both SWAT and Federal land possessions. Sessions isn’t very public ever, and I don’t think he’s running, so I’m not surprised to hear nothing from him.
Most are afraid of the media’s constant trumpeting of federal court orders against Bundy. (Hannity isn’t to his credit).
It’s simple. All they have to say is: “I disagree with those rulings.” They already say they disagree with Roe v Wade, and with other court rulings. Just say the same here, if that’s what they think.
The truth is that Bundy has an “adverse utilization” (not adverse possession) claim against the Feds, real water rights claims, and the Feds have long since used up the time in which they should have indicated a disposition of those lands after Nevada statehood 150- years ago.