Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: P-Marlowe
You never addressed my point. Should some 14 year old budding transmitter engineer be fined $10,000 and face up to a year in prison for broadcasting on a one watt transmitter on an empty fm frequency to his 20 block neighborhood?

If he does it on the spectrum designated for commercial broadcasters, you betcha. Call me a statist. I call you a demagogue if you are saying a 14-year-old would see a multi-thousand dollar fine and/or jail time for that. This story, BTW, is not about a 14-year-old kid, this is a radio station with all the trappings of a licensed broadcaster. I don't care what the power of the station is, they should have the carp fined out of them.

My point about the freeway is you seem to be advocating no rules at all for the broadcasting road. Because radio waves travel distances long enough to be interstate, it's one of the few proper applications of the (badly abused) Interstate Commerce clause of the US Constitution.

53 posted on 04/18/2014 1:15:54 PM PDT by Cyber Liberty (H.L. Mencken: "The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]


To: Cyber Liberty

FYI, I believe TOUCH is running 100 watts, so it’s hardly an enterprising 14 year old kid playing DJ with a 1 watt transmitter.

There’s an FM station in Woonsocket, RI (WWKX, 106.3), which is on an adjacent channel to TOUCH at 106.1. WWKX’s coverage area extends into the Boston metro area, and will be a fairly weak signal at that distance. So there may well be an interference problem.


55 posted on 04/18/2014 1:30:41 PM PDT by Fresh Wind (The last remnants of the Old Republic have been swept away.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

To: Cyber Liberty; xzins

FWIW, the FCC not only controls the airwaves to make sure that stations don’t unduly interfere with each other, they also control who and under what circumstances broadcast licenses are issued and why is allowable content.

Remember the Fairness doctrine? That was used to squelch free speech and the current FCC Nazis are desperately trying to bring it back in order to squelch the voices of conservatives.

Under what theory of the interstate commerce clause does the FCC have the authority to regulate content or force station owners to broadcast viewpoints opposed to the licensee’s morals or politics?

Like all federal bureaucracies, The FCC is a power mad Leviathan that will abuse whatever authority it is given. As with all such beasts, we must always be cognizant of their appetite for power and avoid feeding them at all costs.

Does the FCC have a legitimate purpose. Yes. Do they have way too much centralized power. You betcha. Should some of this authority be delegated to states and local communities. You betcha. The way the FCC is running its business these days, there will be no more mom and pop radio stations anywhere in the country by the end of this decade. Clear Channel and a few others will have a monopoly on all of them. Then the only way to provide alternative broadcasting is to go Pirate and risk the wrath of the Beast.


60 posted on 04/18/2014 3:26:46 PM PDT by P-Marlowe (There can be no Victory without a fight and no battle without wounds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson