This is why we need to question everything the Feds do. Under what constitutional authority does the federal government have to shut this station down if:
1. The radio signals never cross a state line and
2. The signal is not interfering with licensed stations that have signals which cross state lines and
3) the station is not operating for the purpose of making money or otherwise engaging in interstate commerce?
Just because something has been upheld by the courts doesn't make it constitutional. The courts have become an arm of the oligarchy and the tools of creeping totalitarianism.
I'm a ham, and I really have to agree with this. If the individual state wants to regulate it should be free to do so or not.
If a situation does not enter into an area of federal power outlined in Art. 1 Sec. 8 of the Constitution, it's really none of Fedzilla's business.
You said: >>If a situation does not enter into an area of federal power outlined in Art. 1 Sec. 8 of the Constitution, it's really none of Fedzilla's business. This is the part of the Constitution (Article I, Section 8) that permits the FCC's regulation of the radio spectra: To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes;
This is a proper interpretation of the phrase "regulate Commerce...among the several states, and with the Indian Tribes" aka "Commerce Clause." Most applications of the phrase, as used by the present "Fedzilla," are improper, which makes this one of the rare ones that are proper.