Finny and Tammy, while I agree generally, over time it simply reverts back to what it was before the “cattle r roaming”.
Sarge said: while I agree generally, over time it simply reverts back to what it was before the cattle r roaming.
I've come to realize that real nature operates without regard to a status quo. The opposite, in fact, as it constantly shifts and changes, always has and always will. If life and "ecosystems" for lack of better word ever remained static, then we would be in serious trouble. Livestock on open land is as right to be there as not, just as men hunting sea otters and abalone on the coasts are right to be there, ecologically, as not. Change is a constant, so we might as well go with it instead of trying to "preserve" the wind and the weather.
Case in point: in the late 1800s, California coast probably had on average small abalone but lots of sea otters who ate them, said sea otters with fur perfect for clothing for folks in cold climates. Pelt hunters hunted sea otters to extinction on the mild California coast (they survived well in other coastal areas), and as a result, the abalone -- basically big sea snails -- exploded in population and size. As a fishery, delicious abalone supported three generations of commercial ab divers, along with sport divers, swimmingly. Suddenly it dropped off in the mid '70s when sea otter populations mysteriously revived and became FEDERALLY protected. What is the livelihood and food source of real living Americans existing and sharing in ecosystems with other wildlife, compared to a sea otter, after all? I mean, priorities, please!
Ecologists who claim extinction of sea otters "permanently" screwed up the ecosystem enough to cause lack of kelp beds in the '60s and '70s, are asking me not to believe my lying eyes. Ecosystems constantly shift and adapt; life does its thing and the idea of "status quo" is quaint and pathetic. The same thing has happened and is happening to America's fisheries on both coasts, as it is to these cattlemen: THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT IS REGULATING THEM OUT OF EXISTENCE.
We have a right to cultivate, hunt, and harvest food, and be confident that the "environment" and harvesters adapt together as they always have. The Federal government wants to remove that right.
Bottom line.