“You forgot to include nanny laws against prostitution and pedophilia.”
No. This article was about pot and online poker.
..............
Maybe so but hey shouldn’t an old bugger have the right to his own boy while he’s smoking pot and playing online poker. And to be fair to straights —some guys will want to have their prostitute on their lap while they’re smoking pot and playing online poker. Now we’re talking multitasking. Of course some people will not be able to do all these things at the same time. Some people will only do them sequentially. Some people will want to pick and choose. People need choice you know. Oh heck I left out sheep and pigs. Sorry about that.
“Maybe so but hey shouldn’t an old bugger have the right to his own boy while he’s smoking pot and playing online poker. And to be fair to straights —some guys will want to have their prostitute on their lap while they’re smoking pot and playing online poker. Now we’re talking multitasking. Of course some people will not be able to do all these things at the same time. Some people will only do them sequentially. Some people will want to pick and choose. People need choice you know. Oh heck I left out sheep and pigs. Sorry about that.”
Your argument is a bit ridiculous. The thread article is about pot and online poker.
You support a nanny state so instead of commenting on the article you throw in bunch of things that nobody is talking about.
Sorry you had an issue with pot and/or poker. I never did.
I never was a habitual weed smoker or a habitual gambler.
I have had my share of beers though. Maybe the state should make those illegal again. You know, to protect me from myself.