Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Beck is just urging caution, and rightfully so.

I see nothign wrong with his statement. Some people on our side ARE just itching for the fight to begin, and it is easy to see why.

This is the libs trying to stir up trouble. The only reason this story is reported is because they think they can paint Beck in a bad light. You fell for it.


7 posted on 04/15/2014 7:24:28 AM PDT by Mr. K (If you like your constitution, you can keep it...Period. PALIN/CRUZ 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Mr. K

I fell for it? I don’t care if you got here in 1937, don’t patronize me, okay?


13 posted on 04/15/2014 7:26:32 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (I will raise $2M for Cruz and/or Palin's next run, what will you do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Mr. K
The only reason this story is reported is because they think they can paint Beck in a bad light.

Um, this story is from The Blaze - published by Glen Beck.
17 posted on 04/15/2014 7:28:38 AM PDT by nhwingut (This tagline is for lease)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Mr. K

BTW, this is BECK’S website doing the “reporting” on his statement, Einstein!


22 posted on 04/15/2014 7:30:10 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (I will raise $2M for Cruz and/or Palin's next run, what will you do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Mr. K
This is the libs trying to stir up trouble. The only reason this story is reported is because they think they can paint Beck in a bad light.

'The Blaze' - the source of this article - is Beck's own website/media outlet.

So how is this 'libs' tryng to 'stir up trouble'? Does Beck now hire liberals on his own network to write articles raising a stink on his positions? To paint him in a bad light on his own network?

Not a very well thought out post by you.
32 posted on 04/15/2014 7:33:22 AM PDT by bamahead (Few men desire liberty; most men wish only for a just master. -- Sallust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Mr. K

It’s not just this story, Beck has discredited himself many times.


77 posted on 04/15/2014 8:08:51 AM PDT by Bulwyf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Mr. K

Yes, I agree with him on all points, but one: He and Pat kept saying we have representation. But that is just the problem. We don’t. There are some promising prospects out there for the mid-terms, but I am not convinced it’s enough to turn the tides. I have been hearing that we have term limits at the ballot box for decades. It’s not worked out so well for us. I am not saying it is time for CWII. But trying to do this through our system has not worked out so well. I mean, look where we are now, folks. Just look.


99 posted on 04/15/2014 8:34:09 AM PDT by cld51860 (Oderint dum metuant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Mr. K

The thing is, none of us get to choose the breaking point. It’s called ‘the straw that broke the camel’s back.’ Wars have started of incidents that are much more stupid than this.

We’ve got Klamath Falls, the Tombstone water pipe, the Sagebrush Rebellion, the stupid spotted owl that nearly shut down the logging industry, Oregon’s water-grab (from even rain barrels), and so much more. Add to that Reid’s cronyism and abuse of power and we’re getting fed up. Yes, Bundy is breaking the law, but (in all these cases) the law is acting like an ass.

I know that Beck and the other pundits would love a perfectly saintly posterboy to act as the match for the bonfire. I know that nobody wants this to come to bloodshed (alright, there are quite a few who want it to come to that, but they’re frustrated people who’ve gone over the edge because they don’t see us getting out of the tyranny within the rigged system and aren’t really thinking about the serious damage that an armed conflict will do).

But none of us get to pick the breaking point.


138 posted on 04/15/2014 9:46:33 AM PDT by Marie (When are they going to take back Obama's peace prize?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Mr. K

So, our country is not worth fighting for? We should remain passive?


156 posted on 04/15/2014 10:38:28 AM PDT by The_Media_never_lie (The media must be defeated any way it can be done.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Mr. K
The only reason this story is reported is because they think they can paint Beck in a bad light. You fell for it.

Erica Ritz, the writer, is the assistant editor of the Blaze, which is owned by Beck.

Why would she dis her own boss?

So who fell for what? Next time you decide to jump to conclusions you might want to put on a parachute........

158 posted on 04/15/2014 10:50:54 AM PDT by Hot Tabasco (Under Reagan spring always arrived on time.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Mr. K

Beck puts himself in a bad light, no need to report it.


188 posted on 04/15/2014 1:54:49 PM PDT by Fledermaus (I support Joe Carr in the TN GOP Primary against Lamar!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson