Posted on 04/15/2014 5:26:20 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
Critics have blasted George W. Bushs portraits as amateur, very literal-minded and like a freshman art student attempting alla prima, but it is not clear how much of this opinion free-for-all draws on in-person experience of the artworks at the Bush Presidential Library in Dallas and how much is based on mediocre photos and rampant ignorance.
Certainly, some of the former presidents freshman efforts are not notable, but more are remarkable, and a few outstanding. Bushs portrait of Vladimir Putin is stunning, fierce and deeply revealing. It exposes its subjects realities, as successful portraits do.
Other paintings show person and personality while rendering sufficient visual information about who these leaders are.
Bushs portrait of French Prime Minister Nicolas Sarkozy renders deeply expressive concerns and dismay. His painting of former Pakistan President Pervez Musharraf crowds the frame with expansive power. And Bushs Silvio Berlusconi gushes with slick charm.
The simmering portrait of Jiang Zemin, President of the Peoples Republic of China, shows cool calculation. Its nearly neutral forms dont tell us much, but the tiny storm of expressionist brushwork in his complicated face fairly explodes.
Despite the paintings merit, the show is not about art. It is a complicated slice of history marketing Bushs presidency and his theory of Personal Diplomacy, and the portraits have but a small part.
Stirring music blares, and interviews play as visitors recycle through the dark space. I kept hearing Bush calling himself an old dog learning new tricks. And it all kept repeating.
The elaborate presentation is not an art exhibition, and it does few favors for Bushs art, cluttering the space with what the center calls artifacts, photographs, and personal reflections to help illustrate the stories of relationships formed on the world stage. The paintings are hung high over that.
Thus the viewer must observe the art over big glass cabinets heaped with exquisite gifts from countries whose leaders are portrayed. The smallish paintings themselves are surrounded by a busy hodgepodge of photos of the leaders laughing and talking.
The display makes enjoying the oils on canvas into a tiresome challenge, and it makes it harder for photographers to do justice to them. Taking photographs of art hung on dark walls too easily renders the works overexposed and washed out, blotting out Bushs careful colors, brushstrokes and tonalities in images. I had assumed Bushs own presidential center in his current hometown would treat his fine art debut with grace.
This is too bad, because the paintings are full of careful subtleties and expressionistic riffs. Without dates on the art, we cannot follow the arc of the artists still-short trajectory. George W. Bush has only been painting since 2012 first dogs, now people. But hes been attentive and is learning fast.
Like most contemporary artists, Bush uses photography extensively in his work, but he has professional sources, many of whose images have since filtered to the Internet.
Bushs portrait of former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert is probably his most egregious less-than-remarkable piece. The photo the painting was based on is just to its right, and in both we see what photographers call a between-expressions expression.
Olmerts face is between smiling and whatever comes next, and Bush is still laughing. But the painter must have liked that photo. Olmerts painted eyes and forehead are vivid and real, and his ears are among Bushs best, but the mouth and chin look clownish.
Bushs portraits usually employ plain color backgrounds with soft streaks that vaguely outline the heads of the heads of state. The background in the portrait of Rawanda President Paul Kagame is a little more fanciful, though it renders Kagame smaller and less important by tucking him into the bottom corner of a nondescript sky.
A more unusual Bush background serves his portrait of the late Václav Havel, the first President of the Czech Republic. In place of the usual fog of neutral space, we see a wall of books behind the successful playwright, author, essayist, poet, dissident and politician.
Thats not the only departure. Havel has a big smile and dresses informally. He is not looking at the camera/painter because he is having too good a time. We may have issues with whatever is growing on his neck, but his face wins us back with its broad smile and filigree wrinkles.
The paintings of father and son Presidents 41 and 43 are the first we see. They are Bush 43s self-portrait and what he calls a loving study of his father. The elders forehead and cheeks may puff and sag, but the image affects with sweet poignancy.
The artist takes more liberties with his own image, which may be his most recent. The style is very different, with looser, more obvious brushwork, bolder outlines and more vibrant hues, especially in the planes of neck and face. This slightly askance portrait seems more contemporary and informal jaunty yet serious.
The artist is learning his craft.
J R Compton has been writing about Dallas art and artists for 50 years, about birds for the last six, and his online How to Photograph Art may be definitive.
That’s what I was thinking. If these paintings had been done by some minority race gay Muslim, we would be spending millions on grants to the person, for “the arts”.
You’re so right, Ditter. Aren’t his portraits wonderful? The likenesses are incredible.
Painting is not something you learn overnight, it's a process. Usually you don't see the early stages because by the time you see artists' work they are farther along in the learning process.
He's got a good 'eye', and the knack of capturing a likeness - which is not an easy thing to do at all. His brush can't yet quite DO what he can SEE. That takes years.
Pretty good stuff. Painting takes skilled hands and a good eye.
I would LOVE to have the second landscape in my home!
Ditto on second room from his ranch. Would LOVE to hang that on my walls?
That one of Leno is impressive!
I love his paintings — he is on a learning curve but who isn’t when they decide to take on a new challenge? The Putin portrait truly does reveal Putin’s soul. Dark, calculating and untrustworthy. I believe that Bush has talent.
Bush Derangement Syndrome is alive and well.
I can’t believe the liberals and their meltdown over Bush doing paintings.
What the heck is up with that? Liberals, who are so tolerant, allegedly, are not very tolerant of a former president and a hobby of his in retirement. What is the sam hill is political or controversial about his art? Why would anybody criticize an amateur artist for his efforts in the first place, if he likes painting? Aren’t we supposed to be tolerant????
I agree. I hope he continues to work quietly away, undeterred by the Usual Suspects and their screeching.
I guess Obama doesn't feel the need to take up painting...artwork already exists that touches his inner self...
I’m still POed at Bush for lots of excellent reasons. That said, it takes courage to put your art out in front of the whole world, especially when you know it’s only mediocre. I’m sure he doesn’t need the money, or the validation.
.......,.big spender though he was, at least GW respected the military!
I like his work.
amateur, very literal-minded and like a freshman art student attempting alla prima,
Yeah, well he IS a beginner. He IS a ‘student artist’ at this point. Accordingly there are some inconsistencies and beginner’s technical and craftsmanship errors.
HOWEVER ——
There is a sincerity and reach for essential qualities of the subject that is really strong. There is something of the icon in his portraits. To make the subject present, to define their essence and make it real. His paintings are honest observation too - not sarcastic or sycophantic.
There is a strength and honesty in his work that is undeniable, and a respect for his subjects, from world leaders to dogs. He puts me in mind of Lucien Freud, without the angst and alienation. Lucien Freud’s technique is more polished of course, but that is simply the result of experience.
W’s art career has just begun. Perhaps for the first time in his life he is doing what he truly wants to do, for himself instead of others, or the pressure of others. The joy on his face certainly reflects it.
I wish him many more years, much success and all contentment in his art. I hope too that he will continue to be as forthcoming with it as he is now.
He’s quite good. I’ve seen plenty of stuff of far lower quality, evincing far less talent and creativity, hanging in art galleries. I also know people who have been painting for a very, very long time, and taking classes for a very long time, who can’t come close to most of these.
It's not talent he is lacking as a painter; it is skill. That comes with education and practice. What he excels at is "getting" the spirit of a person or place.
Wonder what W thinks about while he is painting? Or, is he painting to avoid reflection?
*******************
One can enter a zone similar to that of a workout. Externals, the passage of time, immediate sense of self can all fade away into inconsequence or even be forgotten. The subject and the rendering is all. It emerges as filtered through the psyche and present skill level of the artist.
Yes it takes you away. I don’t think it is a retreat from reality. It is an immersion in a more focused, intimate and limited reality. Instead of scanning a 360 degree angle, one wholly embraces a one degree angle.
Agree completely.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.