Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 04/14/2014 1:35:52 AM PDT by South40
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: South40

Nope.


2 posted on 04/14/2014 1:37:50 AM PDT by cynwoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: South40

Social engineering through tax rates is nowhere in the Constitution, and FedGov has no business doing it. Tax law should serve the purpose of collecting revenue - only. [Note: I personally would benefit a lot from this proposal, but cronyism is wrong, even when it’s an overreach in my favor.]


3 posted on 04/14/2014 1:42:34 AM PDT by Pollster1 ("Shall not be infringed" is unambiguous.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: South40
"conservative Slate.com columnist . . ,

Conservative? Slate.com?

Thats on oxymoron.

4 posted on 04/14/2014 1:46:08 AM PDT by saywhatagain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: South40
I would actually argue the opposite as it relates to property taxes. I pay $7200 per year in property taxes (NJ), 65% of which goes to fund the local schools. I have no kids. If anything; I should probably get a property tax reduction on the amount of my tax bill that funds the schools.

It seems that the main point of the article is to label the writer as "conservative". I originally read the article on the BBC site and it was simply a conservative-bashing screed. A lot of "dog-whistle" phrases as the left likes to put it.

5 posted on 04/14/2014 2:10:30 AM PDT by American Infidel (Instead of vilifying success, try to emulate it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: South40

MONEY(taxes) is heroin to government giving it to them(it) is a negative procedure..

COLD Turkey is the only recourse..
If givernment is NOT suffering...... YOU ARE!..


6 posted on 04/14/2014 2:19:19 AM PDT by hosepipe (This propaganda has been edited to include some fully orbed hyperbole..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: South40

Krystal needs to look at her 1040 form, specifically lines 42, 48, and 51.


7 posted on 04/14/2014 2:23:43 AM PDT by Fresh Wind (The last remnants of the Old Republic have been swept away.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: South40
conservative Slate.com columnist Reihan Salam

No such thing.
8 posted on 04/14/2014 2:38:49 AM PDT by 98ZJ USMC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: South40

There should be a tax break for raising kids


9 posted on 04/14/2014 2:52:27 AM PDT by Java4Jay (The evils of government are directly proportional to the tolerance of the people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: South40

I would argue the OPPOSITE.

Your “carbon Footprint” is smaller (throw that in their faces). Everything you do is fractionally smaller than those who have families.....yet they are looking for more money from them.


10 posted on 04/14/2014 2:57:10 AM PDT by Red in Blue PA (When Injustice becomes Law, Resistance Becomes Duty.-Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: South40

No, those without children should receive a partial refund of property taxes.


13 posted on 04/14/2014 3:23:23 AM PDT by oblomov
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: South40

Everyone should pay higher taxes so that Mrs. Obama can enjoy another much-deserved vacation!!


14 posted on 04/14/2014 3:25:02 AM PDT by greedo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: South40

In the long term, a country that doesn’t keep itself populated (and populated by its original people) simply dies off and is repopulated by whatever fills the vacuum.

And long term is not that long, as Europe as we know it, will be gone in less than 3 generations - us a generation or two later.

If people are cool with that, I feel sorry for them. If they have kids and are cool with leaving that future to them, they are about as selfish as I can imagine.


15 posted on 04/14/2014 3:38:51 AM PDT by BobL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: South40

Don’t we already do something like this and it’s resulted in single parents and folks who really can’t afford them popping them out over and over to get more welfare checks?


16 posted on 04/14/2014 3:39:05 AM PDT by RWB Patriot ("My ability is a value that must be earned and I don't recognize anyone's need as a claim on me.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: South40

“WELFARE MOMS FOR JUSTICE!”

We are already paying deadbeat welfare vermin to have babies and they ain’t white! Hell, they are spitting babies out like wet watermelon seeds now and just think how many they will spit out if they get the incentive to produce more.

I’ve lived long enough to see the demise of our nation into a cesspool of leeches the those who have absolutely no intention in integrating into our society nor being responsible for their own actions.

With Obama, we are at the tipping point and it would not surprise me (if I live a few years longer) if they rounded up whites (especially males) and put them in internment camps so the GREAT SOCIETY could advance without obstruction.


19 posted on 04/14/2014 4:02:02 AM PDT by DH (Once the tainted finger of government touches anything the rot begins)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: South40

We already do. We don’t have the extra individual deductions. We don’t have tax breaks for day care or health care.


20 posted on 04/14/2014 4:08:16 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: South40

“Nonparents should pay higher taxes so that lower- and middle-income parents can receive a much-deserved tax break. That’s the proposal of conservative Slate.com columnist Reihan Salam.”

Lower and middle income parents already pay less. How about dependent deductions, child care credits, and the best of all the earned income credit. For households qualifying these can add up to $8,000 ~ $10,000 of tax returns. Not only do many of these folks not pay any net federal taxes (50% don’t) about half of those 50% actually pay net negative taxes! meaning as an example if FICA withholdings should be $2,000 an individual meeting the right criteria could receive back after filing an IRS check for perhaps $10,000 or more. Not bad, huh?


21 posted on 04/14/2014 4:12:11 AM PDT by snoringbear (E.oGovernment is the Pimp,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: South40

Leave it to dhimmicrats to always want to raise taxes; it’s all one way w/ them.


22 posted on 04/14/2014 4:53:51 AM PDT by Pietro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: South40

In some ways, people without children already pay higher taxes. They pay property taxes for schools without putting children in them. They don’t get child tax credits.


31 posted on 04/14/2014 6:39:24 AM PDT by tbw2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson