Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Milton Miteybad
"(i.e., grass for his cattle)"

Have you seen the area in question?

123 posted on 04/12/2014 5:31:04 PM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies ]


To: Paladin2

Sure. There’s some grass out there, but not much, because you need half a section to sustain one cow for a year. However, if there’s no grass on the federal tracts, Bundy has no reason to have his cattle on them. He could move them onto whatever lands he himself owns. He might have to feed the cattle himself, though.


138 posted on 04/12/2014 5:52:41 PM PDT by Milton Miteybad (I am Jim Thompson. {Really.})
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson