Rather than rage and attack, why not just point out the falsehoods or the “fantasy”.
You are the one who seems to be relying on opinion and misleading sales pitches, for instance the Reagan feint, you have tried the Huckabee/Santorum bit, you have tried creating a “pro-life liberal movement”, pretending that social liberalism is only for “the group of libertarians” rather than what defines libertarians as not being conservative, trying to say that we can’t hold Paul to his campaign statements.
When you first started posting to me on this thread, it was the start of the theme that you have stayed with, play down the Christian conservatives that make up the tea party (naturally), and to play up libertarians.
learn to read. Until then, stay in the double digit iq threads.
Read and then apologize:
http://reason.com/archives/1975/07/01/inside-ronald-reagan
And google this: (you do know how to google don’t you????)
RR: ““If you analyze it I believe the very heart and soul of conservatism is libertarianism…...The basis of conservatism is a desire for less government interference or less centralized authority or more individual freedom and this is a pretty general description also of what libertarianism is.”
Apology being awaited.