Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DeWalt
Given that nothing in the U.S. Constitution gives the goverment any legal authority to own said land, I will side with the squatters.

Article IV, Section 3: "The Congress shall have power to dispose of and make all needful rules and regulations respecting the territory or other property belonging to the United States; and nothing in this Constitution shall be so construed as to prejudice any claims of the United States, or of any particular state."

That establishes that the federal government can own land and other properties. The land became the property of the U.S. when it was taken from Mexico. Nothing required that ownership be transferred to Nevada when it became a state.

43 posted on 04/10/2014 10:56:19 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: DoodleDawg

And, in fact, Nevada disclaimed those lands when it became a state. See my post up thread.


67 posted on 04/10/2014 11:07:29 AM PDT by BuckeyeTexan (There are those that break and bend. I'm the other kind. ~Steve Earle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson