Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ForYourChildren

the territory aspect is in another article... 4 I think. It was quoted earlier by another poster.

The original poster of that article claims it means territory in general. My contention is that it means areas possessed by the US but are not states. Otherwise, there’d be zero reason to list those things allowed specifically in Art 1, Sec 8, Item 17.


216 posted on 04/10/2014 2:12:34 PM PDT by Grimmy (equivocation is but the first step along the road to capitulation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 211 | View Replies ]


To: Grimmy

Thanks..

Your premise is strong. If we assume it be correct, then they way in which FedZilla created the state of Nevada is certainly unconstitutional - there should have been no strings attached, no continuing FedZilla authority within the state. And those that agreed with the creation should not have!

But they did.. and now, as you “It is not only our right, but our duty as citizens to force the fed gov, by whatever means necessary, to keep its damned self within the limits set by The Constitution.” Which I always agree with!


218 posted on 04/10/2014 2:20:15 PM PDT by ForYourChildren (Christian Education [ RomanRoadsMedia.com - a classical Christian approach to homeschool])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 216 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson