I’m talking about his statement regarding the map. Not application of so called “International Law.” “International Law” are terms that can mean whatever the speaker wishes at any given moment. “International Law” is what is imposed by the victors upon the vanquished. There is no “International Law,” there are treaties between nations which have a similitude to contracts, that is “International Law.” Dump your spleen upon another person.
“I’m talking about his statement regarding the map. Not application of so called “International Law.” “International Law” are terms that can mean whatever the speaker wishes at any given moment. “International Law” is what is imposed by the victors upon the vanquished. There is no “International Law,” there are treaties between nations which have a similitude to contracts, that is “International Law.” Dump your spleen upon another person.”
Those are the words of a person who is behaving as an immoral outlaw who has no respect whatsoever for the humanitarian purposes of the rule of law. There is international law, and there has been for millenia. From time to time there have been people and nations who choose to force the rest of the world to use force to enforce such international laws, and you are a prime example of why it becomes necessary to do so from time to time. If and when there are people who refuse to exercise the self-discipline of respect for the rule of law and human rights, these people who would see the public peace maintained must take action to restore the peace by enforcing such international law. If you don’t like it, so much the better, because we have no sympathy whatsoever for people who have expressed your contempt for international law. You and your views are effectively irrelevant to any civilized discussions.